TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • iggymatrixcounter
    FFR Veteran
    • Nov 2003
    • 1924

    #256
    Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

    Should I keep going or do you think I've humiliated mead enough?
    lastfm
    PANDORA

    Comment

    • talisman
      Resident Penguin
      FFR Simfile Author
      • May 2003
      • 4598

      #257
      Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

      I feel like there should be an option in twg for the wolves to resign, because having to wait another day to finish this is going to be annoying.

      Comment

      • iggymatrixcounter
        FFR Veteran
        • Nov 2003
        • 1924

        #258
        Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

        Why do you think I wanted two lynches for two wolf kills yesterday? XD.

        This whole game has been red tape since disco's death really. With the help of thief chains and ultimate artifact usage, the wolves have stood absolutely no chance.

        But I don't think the wolves played anything wrong, it's just that this thing with disco got us ahead but until then each team was playing their side absolutely perfectly. And even afterwards, everything has been played with almost little error imo. But you'll hear more of exactly what I mean in postgame.
        lastfm
        PANDORA

        Comment

        • mead1
          Cerebellumberjack
          FFR Simfile Author
          • Aug 2003
          • 3960

          #259
          Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

          Originally posted by sertman
          I've thought mead was a wolf all game. However, it HAS been in the back of my mind the entire time that Iggy may be a wolf.

          I still believe that mead is a wolf... again it all goes back to the trying to look human part of it. "WE can get them! WE'VE still got time!" It would also make perfect sense that DBP realized he had "roflcheated" during the night and told his wolf teammates, one of which had the perception artifact, so he "seered" DBP and went to iggy.

          To be honest I'm not sure who to trust. I told Iggy i was suspicious of roundbox as well a couple of days ago, but I held off on voting him when i saw iggy's post last night just in case something like this happened.
          Man, thinking must be really hard for you to resort to such ridiculously flagrant mindless bandwagonning. If you're going to go "lol im following because I'm too stupid to come up with anything myself," go ahead and say it. Everyone will respect you more for it.

          Originally posted by Iggy
          Until you decided to say you seered me red.
          Am I allowed to post pms in this game? If so I'll be glad to prove it in thread.

          Originally posted by Iggy
          Really? Because disco had a deception the night he got seered, how do explain that result? Remember disco came out AS A WOLF. Was his report really red or did you use it on someone else and just assumed it would be?
          and before you bring out the "how did you know he actually had it" defense, observer found a deception artifact right after disco was lynched.
          Because obviously, the deception artifact could not have been found from any of the other players. It must have come from Disco. Iggy, you are a true genius.

          Originally posted by Iggy
          Great line of logic, except you have to prove everything to cast doubt, that is all subjective evidence/ lies to serve your own purpose. None of which can be proven right or wrong. Your other points are being mashed to pieces atm, so this line of thought will have the same weight as a grain of salt.
          None of my points have been mashed at all. I've addressed that in this post. Yeah, if someone pitched my theory too me, I probably wouldn't believe them. But nothing you have said has a shred more evidence than what I've said. You have failed to give any proof of your humanity other than "lol stella said."

          Originally posted by Iggy
          1) Oh really, mind telling me when he seered you? Because as far as trust goes I seered fish and gave him everything I knew. I wanted you seered before disco was, but fish said you had level 2 clearance. Don't know exactly what that was but since you brought it up, I would be glad to hear about what makes you more human than me.

          2) -I was seered, and people know it, you, however, do not know that.
          -I have ousted 4 wolves and therefore there are no more to give to me.
          -I know EVERYONE'S role and gave it to a human for insurance purposes.
          -I was ultimately responsible for EVERY single red seer report that has come back. (taking into the fact that your result is a lie and therefore useless.)
          1) Mind telling me when he seered You? When I heard Fish had been seered, I also gave him everything I knew. I guess Fish being human is the one thing we can agree on. Like I said, what makes me human is the seering of one who later admitted to being red.

          2) -Sorry, the only one who thinks you were seered is yourself, possible sertman.
          -You have ousted four wolves? Where's the proof? You accused me of using reasoning that cannot be proven right or wrong, yet you are no better.
          -I'm happy you know everyone's roles and gave them to a human. This is astoundingly relevant to the issue at hand.
          -Again, you claim my seering is false, but give no proof of your own humanity. I'm happy you take responsibility for the previous lynches. This also has a whole lot to do with proving you are a human. If you know who everyone is, and where every artifact is, you are more than capable of directing those with perception artifacts to seer whoever is holding deception artifacts.

          Originally posted by Iggy
          Why do wolves try to lie? They always get caught when they do. *sigh*
          I don't see how this statement is relevant to what you quoted before it, unless you are insinuating Fish and I had not discussed the possibility of your being a wolf. Fish can confirm that, if you want to ask him.

          Oh ps Iggy

          Comment

          • sertman
            DADALADAH
            FFR Simfile Author
            • Jun 2005
            • 3910

            #260
            Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

            Even though I've said it from the beginning that I think you're a wolf? Maybe not on the thread, but I've always said you've been on the top of my suspicions list. It's not like I was like "o lol iggy said hes a wolf i must vote for him" ever since your first post I've been suspicious of you.

            Last I checked, that's not "ridiculous mindless flagrant bandwagoning".

            Comment

            • talisman
              Resident Penguin
              FFR Simfile Author
              • May 2003
              • 4598

              #261
              Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

              Because obviously, the deception artifact could not have been found from any of the other players. It must have come from Disco. Iggy, you are a true genius.
              stop, drop, and think for a second... only one person was lynched, that person was dbp, observer found a deception right after dbp was lynched (but before the night phase), hmmmm.

              Comment

              • mead1
                Cerebellumberjack
                FFR Simfile Author
                • Aug 2003
                • 3960

                #262
                Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

                Maybe you should get stoic to clarify. I'm under the impression that artifacts of those lynched are redistributed at the same time as artifacts that are lost through random chance. Isn't it all through the same PM?

                Comment

                • JurseyRider734
                  lil j the bad b-word
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 7506

                  #263
                  Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

                  btw why isn't talisman dead yet he's like the top player
                  Originally posted by Arch0wl
                  I'd better be considering I own roughly six textbooks on logic and have taken courses involving its extensive use

                  Originally posted by Afrobean
                  Originally Posted by JurseyRider734
                  the fact that you're resorting to threatening physical violence says a lot anyway.
                  Just that you're a piece of shit who can't see reason and instead deserves a fucking beating.

                  Comment

                  • talisman
                    Resident Penguin
                    FFR Simfile Author
                    • May 2003
                    • 4598

                    #264
                    Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

                    nothing at all to do with the two protections.

                    mead that may be the case (I thought it wasn't), but I think you might still be off since it was known where the other deception was.

                    Comment

                    • iggymatrixcounter
                      FFR Veteran
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 1924

                      #265
                      Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

                      Originally posted by mead1
                      Maybe you should get stoic to clarify. I'm under the impression that artifacts of those lynched are redistributed at the same time as artifacts that are lost through random chance. Isn't it all through the same PM?
                      Nope, you're too busy sitting and doing nothing to realize that they were redistributed right after disco died. That was part of the parameters of his lynch death.

                      @mead: posting a PM from the host gets you banned. Not like it's true anyways, you would be the first to try to doctor something up.

                      Yes I am capable of controlling where stuff goes. But like I've already posted, the people that did the seering did the stealing also. Explain how I could manipulate that?

                      You've only dismissed me, you have not one piece of objective evidence that can be proven by a third party. All your suspicions and all you theories are based on speculation and stuff you say is true. Find one other person that can back anything that you say as true.

                      I've got a whole army of people btw, make your move. I may have done it all, but it was done in a way that proves itself with other people's testimonies. You, on the other hand, have not one supporter to vouche for your claims. And that is why you will not win this. You have nothing.
                      lastfm
                      PANDORA

                      Comment

                      • FishFishRevolution
                        GotR Creator
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 7251

                        #266
                        Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

                        Originally posted by iggymatrixcounter
                        @mead: posting a PM from the host gets you banned. Not like it's true anyways, you would be the first to try to doctor something up.
                        I told him it wasn't because it wasn't role-related.

                        Comment

                        • FishFishRevolution
                          GotR Creator
                          • Nov 2003
                          • 7251

                          #267
                          Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

                          ps sorry mead

                          Comment

                          • alextp1651
                            FFR Player
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 34

                            #268
                            Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

                            ohi this is sertman 8)

                            Comment

                            • talisman
                              Resident Penguin
                              FFR Simfile Author
                              • May 2003
                              • 4598

                              #269
                              Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

                              aight fine mead

                              Comment

                              • mead1
                                Cerebellumberjack
                                FFR Simfile Author
                                • Aug 2003
                                • 3960

                                #270
                                Re: TWG XLII: Raiders of the Temple of the Last Crusade

                                Fine, lynch me on no evidence other then the testimony of an unseered unknown. gg everybody.

                                Comment

                                Working...