Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[AlexDest]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Lol, how does that have anything to do with being insecure, Alex? Again, AS I'VE STATED A HUNDRED TIMES, I know my file repeated itself, it was the pure fact that being a judge means to actually fucking judge a file rather then one line it. Use AJ/Bmah for example. Go back through the batch notes, and look at their notes. They are very detailed and descriptive throughout all of their notes. It's a simple damn concept lol

HERE'S A GOOD CONCEPT, BE MORE LIKE THEM.

One liners are sufficient enough for a simfile such as yours. All we have to denote is that it's repetitive and that the pitch relevancy is off. That's common sense for you surely. The song focuses mainly on pitch relevance only. The same triplet pattern repeats in different pitches throughout the song, which you couldn't grasp very well.

It's your job to improve on your own accord, our job is not to do that FOR you.

[krunkykai22]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

One liners are sufficient enough for a simfile such as yours. All we have to denote is that it's repetitive and the pitch relevancy is off. That's common sense for you surely. The song focuses mainly on pitch relevance only. The same triplet pattern repeats in different pitches throughout the song, which you couldn't grasp that very well.

It's your job to improve on your own accord, our job is not to do that FOR you.

Yes masta

[MarioNintendo]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Going to bed i think you guys are getting nowhere. See ya on the next louis vuitton thread.

<3 :P

[i love you]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Also, keep in mind Krunky that every judge have their own personal preferences when it comes to judging a file or giving out notes. You have lenient/nice people like me, patashu, gundam-dude etc who always goes into detail and actually show you what you did wrong regardless how horrible your file may be and then you have the more elitist ones like wc, alexdest, kommisar etc who rarely does that unless if the file had some potential. If the file sucked, they would not bother going into detail. Instead, they will just tell you what they thought about it and will expect you to figure out the rest for yourself.

This is nothing new.

[krunkykai22]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Yeah, I completely understand that. Personal preference really is everything when you take a step back and think about it.

I understand a lot of what people were saying in the past posts, I do. I merely just wanted to state one simple opinion, but it turned into another debate blah blah. Not too bad this time lulz.

Thanks for your input though, Byron.

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Also, keep in mind Krunky that every judge have their own personal preferences when it comes to judging a file or giving out notes. You have lenient/nice people like me, patashu, gundam-dude etc who always goes into detail and actually show you what you did wrong regardless how horrible your file may be and then you have the more elitist ones like wc, alexdest, kommisar etc who rarely does that unless if the file had some potential. If the file sucked, they would not bother going into detail. Instead, they will just tell you what they thought about it and will expect you to figure out the rest for yourself.

This is nothing new.

except i give you ideas on what to fix even if i dont think the file has potential. the only time i dont go into detail, like spitfire says, is when there is a major problem with the fundamentals of a file. if the sync is wrong with a file i wont go into detail about any other problems because the sync impacts everything else in a file.

i've said this before and i'll say it again. files that are submitted to ffr should already be good to go with no noticeable major problems. we weed out the good from the bad it isnt our responsibility AT THE TIME OF JUDGEMENT to tell you what needs to be fixed in a file but whether or not the file is good to go or not. i shouldnt have to waste my time picking out every single little thing wrong with the file because the is not the job of a judge. we pass judgement that is out job. if i mention anything outside of good/no good that is because the file is near good enough to go in game in my eyes and just needs a few minor tweaks. nothing more than a general overview of a file is really required when telling you my thoughts of a file. its your job to fix the flaws not mine when it comes to judging.

ask me to review a file for you outside of the ffr judging system and i'll go more in depth and pick out things that can be improved further even if what you have is more or less good.

[AlexDest]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

then you have the more elitist ones like wc, alexdest, kommisar etc who rarely does that unless if the file had some potential. If the file sucked, they would not bother going into detail.

You have not read any of my notes obviously, don't point fingers.

Regardless of the simfile, I give detailed and structured notes through time signatures and I may give a little tip on how to make a part play/look better for the player.

Thanks for the insult.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

the only people to really write detailed notes are silvuh and patashu.

wat

yo my batch notes have been the second largest/largest every batch, you ****** lol

I like to think that I'm really detailed, at the least. ;_;

[DarknessXoXLight]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

and then you have the more elitist ones like wc, alexdest, kommisar etc who rarely does that unless if the file had some potential. If the file sucked, they would not bother going into detail. Instead, they will just tell you what they thought about it and will expect you to figure out the rest for yourself.

Reminds me of the time I asked you for help with stepping and all you asked me is if I even tried. /feelingshurt.

[j-rodd123]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

shut up and stop arguing, ashlyn stars is back

[krunkykai22]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

One liners are sufficient enough for a simfile such as yours. All we have to denote is that it's repetitive and the pitch relevancy is off. That's common sense for you surely. The song focuses mainly on pitch relevance only. The same triplet pattern repeats in different pitches throughout the song, which you couldn't grasp that very well.

It's your job to improve on your own accord, our job is not to do that FOR you.

Regardless of the issues between Alex and I, I will admit he does give pretty good reviews. Him and AJ gave my file the most detailed notes in this batch lol

[i love you]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

except i give you ideas on what to fix even if i dont think the file has potential. the only time i dont go into detail, like spitfire says, is when there is a major problem with the fundamentals of a file. if the sync is wrong with a file i wont go into detail about any other problems because the sync impacts everything else in a file.

i've said this before and i'll say it again. files that are submitted to ffr should already be good to go with no noticeable major problems. we weed out the good from the bad it isnt our responsibility AT THE TIME OF JUDGEMENT to tell you what needs to be fixed in a file but whether or not the file is good to go or not. i shouldnt have to waste my time picking out every single little thing wrong with the file because the is not the job of a judge. we pass judgement that is out job. if i mention anything outside of good/no good that is because the file is near good enough to go in game in my eyes and just needs a few minor tweaks. nothing more than a general overview of a file is really required when telling you my thoughts of a file. its your job to fix the flaws not mine when it comes to judging.

ask me to review a file for you outside of the ffr judging system and i'll go more in depth and pick out things that can be improved further even if what you have is more or less good.

I actually did the same thing during the last two batches I judged. I always note people that if you want a more in-depth notes that you should PM me.

Also, like I have said, everyone has their own preferences in terms of judging or taking notes. I personally like to give detailed notes on files that needs them and I like to show the stepartist what they did wrong and possible solutions to those issues even during the time of judgment.

You have not read any of my notes obviously, don't point fingers.

Regardless of the simfile, I give detailed and structured notes through time signatures and I may give a little tip on how to make a part play/look better for the player.

Thanks for the insult.

I apologize. I assumed you did because you seemed to agree with every point wc was mentioning.

Reminds me of the time I asked you for help with stepping and all you asked me is if I even tried. /feelingshurt.

I asked that because I was just curious if you did. Also, that was not all I said, I tried to explain to you the different terms that you should know when stepping a file but you did not quite understand what I was talking about so I linked you to patashu's stepping terms thread so that you could see examples of the terms that I was talking about with you. I even give you a bunch of tips on how to get better faster but I guess you did not followed that.

[Bluearrowll]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Hey guys, what's going on in this thread?

[Charu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Stuff.

[AlexDest]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Hey guys, what's going on in this thread?