- We calculate final scores of a file in two ways, "raw average" and "adjusted average" (halving MAX & MIN scores). If one of these is above the cutoff then the file is accepted. Both scores should be above the certain line for SAP(2) or SAP(3).
Can you clarify this rule, please? Wouldn't the adjusted average -always- be below the raw average?
I'll bid a single erotic yet safe-for-work photo of me posing while wearing my Piplup hat while sucking on a blueberry lollipop with my mouth partially open so you can see the lollipop color to verify it's blueberryness.
Disclaimer: This photo is not guaranteed to cause pleasure.
FYI, we have a system to make the rating system fairer (ex. when one judge's rating is drastically lower/higher than others).
- If average rating of one group is higher than another one, the final ratings will be adjusted between groups (average file quality factor = 50%, judge's strictness factor = 50%).
- If a judge is stricter/more lenient (lower/higher average rating) than others in the same group, the ratings will be adjusted. Variation of ratings will be considered too.
- We calculate final scores of a file in two ways, "raw average" and "adjusted average" (halving MAX & MIN scores). If one of these is above the cutoff then the file is accepted. Both scores should be above the certain line for SAP(2) or SAP(3).
I thought the exact same thing that AJ did. When calculating it before the n-1 it was ALWAYS consistently lower ... naturally. Now with the (n-1) I see how both scores would differ then.
Comment