Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[Razor]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

how 2 layer 101

[krunkykai22]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Subjectivemanias.

People judge as they feel fit hence why they are judges lol

You don't see me going to Kommi and bitchin up a storm because he gave me a 2 lol

Deal with it

[ichliebekase]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Either way, there was no need for rude comments. And again, a PM would have been fine. Also, there is no "main point" in my critique. It was just the first one because it came first in the song. The awkward patterns came later in the song, so it was written second. Get over yourself.

[Nullifidian]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Subjectivemanias.

People judge as they feel fit hence why they are judges lol

You don't see me going to Kommi and bitchin up a storm because he gave me a 2 lol

Deal with it

that's because kommi knows what he's talking about

[krunkykai22]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

So I get a 6,6,7 and the 2 from Kommi and he knows what he's talking about? LOL

Not to mention it was AlexDest, TC_Halogen AND JX .... SO apparently they have no idea what they're doing and were completely stupid in giving good ratings because why? rofl

[Razor]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

maybe you got a 2 cause your file sucks l 0 l

[krunkykai22]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Lol maybe, just maybe But why would the others give it 6+ :P

[Nullifidian]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

So I get a 6,6,7 and the 2 from Kommi and he knows what he's talking about? LOL

Not to mention it was AlexDest, TC_Halogen AND JX .... SO apparently they have no idea what they're doing and were completely stupid in giving good ratings because why? rofl

I never implied they don't know what they're doing.

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

it's not how I personally would have chosen to layer it. If I'm stepping the bass as jumps, then I continue them as jumps. If I'm stepping them as single notes, I continue them as single notes. I guess it's a matter of consistency

you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it
you arent stepping the file so dont judge or comment based on how you would step it


saying its a matter of consistency is stupid. im not sure what your definition of consistency is when in reference to stepping but my definition is file structure and execution remains similar throughout the entire file

just because spitfire doesnt step using the same techniques you were taught does not make his file inconsistent.

[Xx{Midnight}xX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

that's because kommi knows what he's talking about

(Note: Kommi is a good judge in my opinion.)

[AlexDest]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

waaah my file got rejected the judges suck its unfair

[krunkykai22]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

I never implied they don't know what they're doing.

Then please elaborate how your statement that he know's what he's doing is even rational in this situation? Especially when compared to the other 3 judges I mentioned?

[Nullifidian]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Then please elaborate how your statement that he know's what he's doing is even rational in this situation? Especially when compared to the other 3 judges I mentioned?

Different opinions are valid, as long as they're argumented properly.

[krunkykai22]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Different opinions are valid, as long as they're argumented properly.

I agree with you 100%, I really do, but take a look at this:

Kommisar:
NRG (2/10)
-Basically just a very repetitive jumpstream that cuts off abruptly.

TC_Halogen:
NRG (krunkykai22)
Rating: 6/10 [+.]
- incredibly generic song
- pitch relevancy is alright but certainly could use reworking in the second half when both the melody and lower chords change
- layering is acceptable
- despite the short length, file drags quite a bit, as it's just one big 16th stream for a minute

NRG (krunkykai22) - [+.] 6/10
- Ehhhh, the song choice is lackluster and it's repetitive. Your pitch relevancy is inconsistent so, I'm only going to point out a couple errors.
- s3.47 should be an up arrow and s3.70 should be a right arrow. This error continues.
- s14.78, should be the same jump from before (a [23]). This kind of pattern continues through-out.
- The file should end with a 16th note. I'd suggest going over your pitch relevancy more discreetly.


NRG (krunkykai22) 7/10
Not very good termination of the song (need better edition), and not very variable in the structure due to the song, but overall good PR/pattern choice and replayable short file.


looking at those notes, tell me in what way his notes were argumented correctly? At least the other 3 gave proper mistakes to fix. How can I fix anything based upon what Kommi said?

[Razor]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

lmao.

"i think ur file is inconsistent because i wouldn't have stepped it in xxxx way, but dont worry i gave u a 7, its ok no big deal."