Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[Coolboyrulez0]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Notes MIA

[Choofers]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Actually, I learned the opposite of this in psych class (I just had a test yesterday, go figure).

It turns out that when people do a task expecting a reward, their intrinsic motivation for that task decreases as opposed to if they had been rewarded after the task without being notified of the reward prior to finishing it, or if they had not been rewarded at all.

Here's an article explaining the study that the effect originated from: http://explorable.com/overjustification-effect.html

Basically, the researchers went to a nursery school and observed the children’s intrinsic interest in various school activities. The 3- to 5-year old children were made to play and draw using felt-tipped pens and were at the same time, put into one of three different conditions for the experiment:

- First Condition: The Expected Award Condition
In this condition, the children were promised to receive a “Good Player” ribbon for participating in the activity where they will be drawing with the use of felt-tipped pens. Take note that the kids have already been doing this activity ever since, and with pure intrinsic interest.

- Second Condition: Unexpected Award Condition
In this condition, the children were not told about the reward they would be getting until they actually finished the activity.

- Third Condition: No-Reward Condition
Lastly, in this third condition, the children were not told or given any kind of reward. This group of kids served as the control group, since extrinsic rewards were not involved either before or after the said activity.


Later on, the children were again observed in a free-play setting to find out whether there is a significant difference in the number of children participating in the same activity, this time, without any promise of a reward. Here's a graph of what happened when they let the kids play:



As you can see, the kids who were originally given an incentive to drawing spent considerably less time doing it by themselves without reward, thus illustrating the decline of instrinsic motivation with the presence of rewards.

It's a really interesting effect, and if you want to do more reading into I suggest you do - psychology in general is really interesting.

STEPMANIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
caps

[VisD]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

i'll take batch notes for $200 please Trebek

[kommisar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

"The sentiment of something urgent, which requires waiting"

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

What are blue balls

[Hateandhatred]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

What are blue balls

/discussion

[iironiic]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Really happy with Beatrice's outcome (: Glad the judging team enjoyed it!

Beautiful Arrhythmia passed as well. (:

[FissionMailed1]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Wow. Was not expecting those ratings. This outcome is better than expected

EDIT: 44 Edit - 7 / 8 / 6 / 8 [7.25]

[VisD]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

uruguguigrghi

Challenge: 6.75
What Lies: 7

@Comments for Challenge the final mission!:

Yeah, I'll have to go fix up that fake 12th trill part lol, which I'll do if it gets in. I dislike it myself actually, but had no better idea at the time. I did contemplate putting straight 24ths, but the the rest of the file is like a 62-64, and straight 24ths at the part is like 17nps for 6 seconds iirc

[MarioNintendo]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Alright guys, I'll be judging the passed files, just for your information I did not open the review thread, I will do that only when I'm done. Best of luck to all!

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

@ bmah towards Move It Groove It:

- 53.33s,55.47s,etc.: is there really a distinguishment between these bursts? I can't imagine KaW deciding to vary between 32nds and a small polyrhythm; I'm fairly sure he'd make them consistent.

Haha, they actually are different! I checked multiple times myself because I'm a huge stickler about proper rhythms.

Also: towards Undiscovered Colors:

- 136.17s: doesn't sound emphasized enough for a hand

It's not really a huge emphasis on the particular sound itself because it isn't loud, but it's an echoed sound that is also the last piece of percussion in the song.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Ok, all notes, except passed and skipped files, have been posted.

phew

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Undiscovered Colors: 9/9/8/8
Move it Groove it [Heavy]: 8/8/8/9
Into Your Eyes: 7/8/7/[x]

...waiting anxiously about that last one.

Also, Kayla and I didn't coordinate our charts; we just knew that one another were stepping the same song and knew that my chart was going to be considerably harder (don't quite agree with the note about the charts being too similar to be in game, because my chart is considerably harder).

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Oh I know that you were working separately. I just wanted to justify why I gave one a 9 and the other an 8.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions CLOSED)

Oh I know that you were working separately. I just wanted to justify why I gave one a 9 and the other an 8.

Oh, I was referring to Sara's note, haha. It's not a big deal at all, to be honest.