Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[TC_Cyrenics]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Yay, I think I'm gonna have my first file ingame after all, though it's a collab. Whee~ <3

[i love you]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Going to start judging right now, will probably finish sometime tomorrow

[dore]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

interesting file Arch...dotdotdot

...

[dore]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

2 files judged, 0 accepts. at this rate everyone fails

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

correcting a mistake for team 3.

[Team 3]
Silvuh
qqwref
kommisar
Arch0wl

[New files - 19]
From "Contain" to "Ready to go" and "Cheeseburger", excluding "Energizer", "Piano Practice"

[Resubmissions - 7]
From "Four Blocks Madness" to "Scavenger" and "White Walls"

[justin_ator]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

With the judge deadline being the end of Jan, will the batch open again in early Feb? Or is there a period between the two? Sorry if I am being a nuisance, I got ignored the first time I asked..

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

just realized that I sent in The Crow's Newspaper without adding silence, and the first note starts right away. I'll take care of it once I find out how it does rating wise.

@ Justin: more than likely, once the notes are up, the batch will reopen immediately after.

EDIT: just realized that both Cheeseburger and Strikebeam are missing their artist tags...gotta remember that about DDream. I really hope I don't get auto-rejected for something as simple as an artist tag when it can be added later.

Either way:
Cheeseburger - Sanxion7
Strikebeam - Waterflame

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

brb judging batch

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

finished judging \o/ yay for waking up at 11pm and having absolutely nothing else to do
resubmissions:
+=2
+.=1
+1
?=2
Regular submissions:
+=5
+.=5
+?=1
?=2
-=6
--=1

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

done judging

b/c it's mandatory that I do this:

+ = 9
+. = 9
+? = 5
? = 0
- = 3

I felt like I didn't have an awful lot to talk about this time - am I not being proactive enough in looking for flaws and too easily accepting 'good enough' products, or is the batch reasonably good this time?

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I felt like I didn't have an awful lot to talk about this time - am I not being proactive enough in looking for flaws and too easily accepting 'good enough' products, or is the batch reasonably good this time?

As strict as I was, I only had 8 files that were ? or lower (including re-subs, I had 11 accepted files), and this is with extremely detailed notes. I spent a ton of time looking at some of these files. We -definitely- got the good side of the batch.

[Arch0wl]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

done judging as well,

[++]: 2
[+]: 9
[+.]: 6
[+?]: 3
[?]: 4
[-]: 2
[--]: 0

[ichliebekase]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

done judging as well,

[++]: 2
[+]: 9
[+.]: 6
[+?]: 3
[?]: 4
[-]: 2
[--]: 0

This makes me feel a lot better since you had my resubmission :3 I was kind of worried about your judging style.

[customstuff]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

And I think Arch had my file...

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

yo arch do you have aim/msn?