Re: Need some opinions
It is a huge misconception that copyright sort of disappears if monetary gain isn't involved, which is incorrect. The usage of copyrighted works without the permission of the rights holder (unless dictated in some form of free use or if the rights to material expired) is copyright infringement. Just because "I'm not making any money off of it" doesn't change anything, and is the misconception of those uninformed with general copyright law.
FFR does have copyright in mind, by the way, because technically all of the engine builds of "Flash Flash Revolution is Copyright Synthetic Light Studios 2002" up until the current year. That is, unless Synthlight wants to completely remove his rights to have FFR noted as a copyrighted work, in which case everyone essentially has the legal right to copy, host, and distribute any part of FFR anywhere. I don't think that is something you guys want.
Every submission you guys get is a stepper granting FFR the permission to use his works in the game, but that is all it is, permission. This permission (at the moment) is not permanent, indefinite, or by any means irrevocable. Users rights are not removed from them under the current policy, because you have no policy to work with in your legal favor. Without previsions step artists agree to that remove some of their rights, they can revoke their permission at any time. You may attempt to refuse, but a step artist can follow suit with sending a take down notice for their copyrighted materials as mentioned in the DMCA. Now, due to the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act, if you take down the infringing materials, this is as far as it will go (since it wouldn't be infringing until they decided to remove their permissions). I'm not saying that most step artists would file a lawsuit on FFR if you refused to remove their content, but it is a possibility if you choose to believe step author's rights don't exist (even without a proper rights transfer to FFR).
I think this was skipped over, I'll re-post my example terms and conditions I wrote last night regarding this FFR could potentially use as a new policy to prevent this stuff from happening in the future:
It is a huge misconception that copyright sort of disappears if monetary gain isn't involved, which is incorrect. The usage of copyrighted works without the permission of the rights holder (unless dictated in some form of free use or if the rights to material expired) is copyright infringement. Just because "I'm not making any money off of it" doesn't change anything, and is the misconception of those uninformed with general copyright law.
FFR does have copyright in mind, by the way, because technically all of the engine builds of "Flash Flash Revolution is Copyright Synthetic Light Studios 2002" up until the current year. That is, unless Synthlight wants to completely remove his rights to have FFR noted as a copyrighted work, in which case everyone essentially has the legal right to copy, host, and distribute any part of FFR anywhere. I don't think that is something you guys want.
Every submission you guys get is a stepper granting FFR the permission to use his works in the game, but that is all it is, permission. This permission (at the moment) is not permanent, indefinite, or by any means irrevocable. Users rights are not removed from them under the current policy, because you have no policy to work with in your legal favor. Without previsions step artists agree to that remove some of their rights, they can revoke their permission at any time. You may attempt to refuse, but a step artist can follow suit with sending a take down notice for their copyrighted materials as mentioned in the DMCA. Now, due to the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act, if you take down the infringing materials, this is as far as it will go (since it wouldn't be infringing until they decided to remove their permissions). I'm not saying that most step artists would file a lawsuit on FFR if you refused to remove their content, but it is a possibility if you choose to believe step author's rights don't exist (even without a proper rights transfer to FFR).
I think this was skipped over, I'll re-post my example terms and conditions I wrote last night regarding this FFR could potentially use as a new policy to prevent this stuff from happening in the future:















Comment