Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

how's it going

RATO wouldn't be accepted if it was a true dump. It's just too hard for most of people here and maybe bad for combo scoring system in terms of competition.

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

who cares. people were bitching for another really hard file. we gave y'all a really hard file... and you bitch. deal with it.

also, will work on the batch tomorrow. will probably have it done by tuesday.

[dood gone krazee]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

who cares. people were bitching for another really hard file. we gave y'all a really hard file... and you bitch. deal with it.

also, will work on the batch tomorrow. will probably have it done by tuesday.

You never can fully please the public, huh?

Okay let's see so I sent in the RATO fix and a collab to this batch, so that would mean I have one more file to submit?

Cool lemme go fix Milky Blue.

[SulferDragon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

who cares. people were bitching for another really hard file. we gave y'all a really hard file... and you bitch. deal with it.

FFRers sure are a fickle bunch of people.

[Zybanthia]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I really just hate the rolls in RATO, that's it. They remind me of some of the rolls in Hajnal. I don't have fun playing RATO, but it's a synced file etc.

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

except the rolls in hajnal aren't nearly as fast o.O

[Zybanthia]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

That wasn't my point. My point was that some of the rolls and Hajnal are undeniably holds.

And don't get me wrong, I love Hajnal.

[ninjaKIWI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

That wasn't my point. My point was that some of the rolls and Hajnal are undeniably holds.

No.
You have no idea what you're talking about.

[Zybanthia]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Relax champ, I said some of. I really do know what I'm talking about. Thanks for looking out for me though, I appreciate it.

[ninjaKIWI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Relax champ, I said some of. I really do know what I'm talking about. Thanks for looking out for me though, I appreciate it.

No, none of those rolls should be holds you're an idiot. Would you like to show me which of those rolls was stepped to a continuous sound?

[gnr61]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

although i dont remember the song at all i wouldn't be in the least surprised if there were some bursts stepped to musical buzzes or something which technically would be represented better as freezes

[ninjaKIWI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

although i dont remember the song at all i wouldn't be in the least surprised if there were some bursts stepped to musical buzzes or something which technically would be represented better as freezes

Not really, I just went through the file a few times. And even if so, I believe that if it's a ****ing roll, make it a ****ing roll, I hate it when people step freezes to that stuff.

[Zybanthia]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I understand the needs to step things like that in FFR because there are no holds, freezes, whatever you call them, etc and people don't want to "leave a sound out"... but I just really hate when people do that. gnr nailed what I'm talking about; there are a few musical buzzes that are represented by some wanky 48th rolls, and while the file really is fun, those always bug the crap out of me. It feels dumb trying to play a buzz by rolling on keyboard keys.

[ninjaKIWI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Well, technically, it shouldn't be a roll OR a freeze. It should be a Jack, and since a jack at that speed is just complete BS, I believe that a Roll represents it best. Whether it's in FFR or not.

[gnr61]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

wait
how the hell does a rhythmically bullsh!t roll better represent an impossible speed long jack than a freeze