Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[Bolth mannn]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

im pretty sure i submitted my song between those dates...

if not, it wouldve been a day or two after that date...

so im guessing you do monthly batchs?

i guess it kinda makes sense, gah that sucks

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Kommi and patashu can my file get an autoaccept cause its the same file p. much cept a couple parts made better... and no freezes. I know you both liked it

oh yeah jx is going to be foreign and want to judge it whoops

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

guys. stop asking what your file got. you'll find out when batch notes are put out.

as far as how many files i'll be playing... needs at least a +. from 2/3 judges for me to play it. and given jx's strictness, i'm sure that'll be the factor that determines how many files i have to play. i'm guessing, most likely, whatever jx +s or +.'s, at least 1 of the other 2 will. although i imagine there will be a few that are +.'d by kommi/patashu and not jx. i'll still test those.

whee. but i'll be in vegas from sun-thurs, so won't be able to test then. still waiting on jx's notes.

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

why not play anything that we both +.ed or above right now?

[-Barista-]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

why not play anything that we both +.ed or above right now?

Because. . . that's why.

[dore]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

why not play anything that we both +.ed or above right now?

he likes having all the judges' notes to cross-reference to help make his decision?

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

okay that works

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I'm a bit confused myself, but I think he was saying he finished some update... because two posts before he said "okay finished", he said he had 40 files to go.

you're right I'm not finished the batch yet, still have 20 unplayed files.

won't take so long though

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

20 is nothing knock 'em down

[gnr61]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

shoot 'em all

[Bolth mannn]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

reject 'em all

[Yoshiisland]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I'm sure mines is [--]

Anyone has a gun?

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

i think mines are just a -

i think -- is reserved just for files that are ungodly terrible

[Yoshiisland]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

i think mines are just a -

i think -- is reserved just for files that are ungodly terrible

Which is most likely mines.

[Zybanthia]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[-] The lowest rating that you will likely achieve. The file is basically pretty bad and needs to be completely redone, or the file was rejected for the following:
-A freeze arrow or mine was used anywhere in the file
-A significantly incorrect BPM was used
-A section of it was way, way, way too hard, like a wall of 64th quads or something similarly ridiculous
If any of the above are noticed, the judge has the right to immediately quit out and give the file a [-] rating, regardless of the quality of the rest of the file.

Well, there you have it.