Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[Elite Ninja]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

16bitFruit [7,9,7,7,8,8] - I wasn't actually expecting this lol.

Cut is really sharp (unless that
really is just the end of the song lmao.)

Yeah, it really does end there. No cut haha.

- I find your jump usage/layering a bit questionable at times when you choose to omit beats and/or snares. Why not simply step them at all time?

Aha. I had stepped this song with more layered jumps previously but when I asked people to test it... they didn't agree with it... So I just decided to only step the snares.

Cs Custom Gun Sounds [7,9,9,7,8,8] - Rofl I love how some of the judges thought this was the same song as the song in FFR called Counter Strike Gun Sounds. Both come from the same artist but are both different songs and charts. Glad you liked it ^^

if only those gunshots were real and the bullets were aimed at your head. work on jack usage they played really awkwardly.

Enchanting Venus [6,7,7,8,7,7] - Well no matter how I step this it seems like almost every judge wants me to make it repetitive and doesn't realise how my appoach on the file was to make it less repetitive. Oh well, I'll see how I can fix this.

Shimasen N Bass [7,6,6,2,6,7] - Guess this is just one of those files/songs that I enjoy and no one else does.

And Kommi, you don't have a good enough reason to give it a 2. Don't think you realise how I was trying to make the file less repetitive.




Thanks for all the reviews guys. Much appreciated!

[Choofers]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

And Kommi, you have no ****ing reason to give this file a 2. Use your 2s more wisely next time. You don't realise my approach on trying to make the chart less repetitive.

Mad cuz bad, obviously there's a reason he gave it a two.

[Niala]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Wow, I expected to wake up to bitching galore, but it seems very tame in here. Go FFR team~

In response to:

Aerospace 8-8-8-8-7-4 (Niala hating damb) 7.16
Gravity Blast 8-8-8-8-7-8 (Carlos your review was ****ing hilarious) 7.83
Steel Monster 4-5-9-7-8-5 (Subjective as hell whoa, missed the 6.5 by a single point >:C) 6.33

Hehe~~~
Sorry, I really didn't think that file was well done, but that's exactly why we have multiple judges. If one judge doesn't like a file for whatever reason, and five others do, then the one judge, in this case, myself, is probably wrong about it. I do stand by my rating, however, but I hope there's no hard feelings about it. n.n
Congrats on accepteds~~

[leonid]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Lowest and highest ratings are removed anyway (if that makes the avg better) so one judge's rating being too low shouldn't be much of a problem

[hi19hi19]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Anyone planning on submitting a file for Incident Zero next normal batch?
Wondering if I should bother submitting mine or not

[woker-X]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

May the Triforce Be With You (5/8/9/10/8/8)

wasn't expecting a 10... or a 5 lol

anyway, thanks for the comments guys, I'll fix as needed

PS: too bad I don't have a Carlos review

[FFR Pro 21]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

DATA DRAIN - Well, this didn't go very well unfortunately, will definitely have to redo this one for next time. Oh well, live and learn from your mistakes and try again, I guess.

Gargoyle (8/7/7/8/5/7 Average: 7) - Alright, was pretty happy to see the ratings that this file got, I'm glad to see people who liked my creation .

[leonid]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

DATA DRAIN - Well, this didn't go very well unfortunately, will definitely have to redo this one for next time.

Please don't redo DATA DRAIN

ever

[FFR Pro 21]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Please don't redo DATA DRAIN

ever

Fine then, I won't redo it, I'll just throw it away.

[leonid]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Yes thank you
Step some better songs

[00Razor00]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Velaciela: 8-8-6-7-9-7 = 7.5

...tbh that's a LOT better than I was expecting =S

add 16ths to 12 section plz <3

also, i'll try to get back to everyone who sent me a PM regarding their file.

Also, thanks for the quality review, clear and pretty helpful to file improvment.

no problemo.

question Razor: what did you mean by the 0.000 syncing/offset?

Your file's offset was 0.000 when I opened it in DDream. Even though it was in sync, I just mentioned it cause I thought it was weird.

[Choofers]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

data drain review: urbs/10

[FFR Pro 21]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Yes thank you
Step some better songs

I already have one done and ready for the next batch, and I made sure it was a good song choice and had lots of effort put into it.

data drain review: urbs/10

I get it dude, DATA DRAIN was a horrible song choice, I'll admit it.

[dragonmegaXX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

gnr61:
Destination of the Heart - Really generic. Watch the PR in the
intro. The file's basically correct and sort of fun but simply really
straightforward and there's a bunch of songs like this already.
6/10

The PR in the beginning = -4 points ?_?

[leonid]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

gnr61:
Destination of the Heart - Really generic. Watch the PR in the
intro. The file's basically correct and sort of fun but simply really
straightforward and there's a bunch of songs like this already.
6/10

The PR in the beginning = -4 points ?_?

PR issue + file being generic = -4 points