Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[dragonmegaXX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

how do you rate genericness 3:

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Presumably -3 considering a file needs to be something special to get that awesome 10/10 rating.

also seems like he wasn't diggin your structure, yo

[leonid]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

how do you rate genericness 3:

if a file is okay but generic etc it's supposed to receive 6 or 7

[Choofers]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Points aren't linear (they shouldn't be). Compare the differences between a 9/10 and 10/10, and then compare the differences between a 6/10 and 7/10.

Getting a 6/10 just means your file is an average file. Make it better.

[megamon88]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

if a file is okay but generic etc it's supposed to receive 6 or 7

I should've used a lot more 6s and 7s then :/ lesson learned though, I'll be somewhat stricter with ratings next time.

[00Razor00]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Honestly though, if the structure and concepts of a chart are decent but still feel generic as a whole, then it should (imo) be given a 7. But if there are technical errors found (such as PR, inconsistent layering, etc.), then a 6 is more plausible.

[AlexDest]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

I usually stay away from dismissing a song as generic. As long as the chart is easy to understand and everything goes accordingly to it, it will get the rating it deserves (8 or 9 at most).

[DarkZtar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

add 16ths to 12 section plz <3

Would that have made it a 10/10? =3 (considering adding them right now)

[leonid]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

No technical errors =/= 10/10

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

No technical errors =/= 10/10

ver true

[yo man im awesome]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Your file's offset was 0.000 when I opened it in DDream. Even though it was in sync, I just mentioned it cause I thought it was weird.

Ah ok, I thought that was the reason for the rating rofl

edit: the syncing was done by hatred, when we were originally going to do it as a collab.

[rayword45]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Dreamerz: 6/3/8/5/5/3 - 6 average. lolwtf? You guys are WAY too ****in lenient if this got a 6 average. I submit this in a hurry solely for the notes.

F~S: 6/3/6/8/5/5 - 6.5 average: I'm not Xandertrax.

[ichliebekase]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Dreamerz: 6/3/8/5/5/3 - 6 average. lolwtf? You guys are WAY too ****in lenient if this got a 6 average. I submit this in a hurry solely for the notes.

F~S: 6/3/6/8/5/5 - 6.5 average: I'm not Xandertrax.

Check yourself; your average was 5, not 6 on Dreamerz. Even when you drop the highest and the lowest, your average was 4.75.

Also, F~S average is 5.5, not 6.5. Still 5.5 when you drop highest and lowest.

[rayword45]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

Check yourself; your average was 5, not 6 on Dreamerz. Even when you drop the highest and the lowest, your average was 4.75.

Also, F~S average is 5.5, not 6.5. Still 5.5 when you drop highest and lowest.

Yeah, I divided by 5, not 6 XD

Will post opinions on notes in a bit

[kommisar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)

pretty much what i expected, minus a ****in 2/10 from kommi with a 7/7/7/7/5 from everyone else lolol.

Star wars antholoshit resubmit: +/8/7/7/7/7

lets not talk about thrashbaath.

i'm so sorry lol