Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[Xx{Midnight}xX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

Go look at his review for Robotomy. It is riddled with subjectivity and an obvious dislike to the song. He gave it a 1/10, which should not be possibly unless the file is offsync, which it clearly isn't. The rating was entirely unfair and not called for, so that should be sufficient reason to not be allowed to judge.

Eh. I haven't seen it but regardless, everything in stepping aside from Sync is pretty much subjective to a point in my mind. I'll have to go skim it later I guess.

And to be honest even if it's synced correctly a chart can still be such a train wreck it gets a one to me. But that's just my thoughts.

[sanzath]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

I sent a file, when does batch #2 open???

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

To give you an idea, I judge fairly strictly...

...but I still gave Robotomy a 7/10. The song is something else, yeah, but the notes for that particular file were uncalled for. Taking off for music choice is acceptable if the song is unprofessionally done, but the song is quite complex in its own right and would merit a pass, rather than a major deduction.

Also, I vouch for Rog's simfiling ability, he knows what he's doing and would probably make a fine judge if he took it seriously.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

I sent a file, when does batch #2 open???

Batches don't close. They're always open now.

But if you're talking about when the next 120 files are reviewed, that won't be until at least we get another 120 files! And of course, not until this current batch is finished.

Things will slow down, because people's ability to submit files are limited by bi-monthly SAP (simfile artist points).

[FissionMailed1]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

Eh. I haven't seen it but regardless, everything in stepping aside from Sync is pretty much subjective to a point in my mind. I'll have to go skim it later I guess.

And to be honest even if it's synced correctly a chart can still be such a train wreck it gets a one to me. But that's just my thoughts.

Right, it can be an absolutely awful chart still, but my point was that objectively, if it is correctly synced and the BPM is correct, etc., it should not receive lower than a 2/10. It did though, which is very unprofessional, and completely disregards any standard of judging to push an agenda.

Also, I vouch for Rog's simfiling ability, he knows what he's doing and would probably make a fine judge if he took it seriously.

+1

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

I don't want robotomy on FFR because it isn't an FFR file. If I have to judge robotomy I won't be passing it and I'll be giving it a1/10 on the grounds that the song and file are not fit for FFR.

[Choofers]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

if that's the case then we should pull a bunch of files from FFR because they're not "fit for FFR"


whatever that means

[04im]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

judges right now be all like:

[Xx{Midnight}xX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

@ kjwkjw: The process is going to slow speed up.

You know, I don't know if this has ever been asked, but what makes a judge? What does one have to do to either get experience and or learn to judge anyways?

To be honest, this is a good question. But I also think this is really dependent on who you ask. Like the thirdstyle users see me as a judge (to be honest I think I'm still somewhat a little closed minded to be one, but hey I'm happy to do what I can.) But I mean by FFR standards, I'd be a pretty bad judge in retrospect as I am now. (I'd love in the future to try my hand at it though, but I think I need a little more refinement in learning terminology and such.)

I could make a pretty good influence on the quality of the charts, overall, in game. that said I've said some pretty inflammatory shit both on and off the forums so if there was doubt as to my quality as a judge i wouldn't be surprised lmao.

See I can agree with this. You aren't my favorite person by any means, but your personality has no effect on your judging capability. In fact, I loathe most of your charts in SM, and I still think you'd be an asset as a judge. They're just not my cup of tea to be fair. :3

[Choofers]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

because you're bad at stepmania

[FissionMailed1]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

I don't want robotomy on FFR because it isn't an FFR file. If I have to judge robotomy I won't be passing it and I'll be giving it a1/10 on the grounds that the song and file are not fit for FFR.

h4h4 jokez, funny guy (y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y). This is basically what I gathered out of Niala's review of Robotomy though.

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

if that's the case then we should pull a bunch of files from FFR because they're not "fit for FFR"


whatever that means

I did the same this to dossars metro file don't worry its not like I'd be picking on you.

I'd also be OK with pulling file that aren't really for FFR

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

i hope this isn't a serious post

It is

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

h4h4 jokez, funny guy (y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y). This is basically what I gathered out of Niala's review of Robotomy though.

Sorry not joking

Hate on me

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

Also just because a song can be stepped doesn't mean it should be