Uh, I think smoking the constitution would be bad because of the ink.
"A new take on the epic fantasy genre... Darkly comic, relatable characters... twisted storyline."
"Readers who prefer tension and romance, Maledictions: The Offering, delivers... As serious YA fiction, I’ll give it five stars out of five. As a novel? Four and a half." - Liz Ellor
The fact that I was stoned when I went to the doctor's on Tuesday before I went to the hospital for surgery and neither my parents or the doctors questioned me should also tell you something about how little it impairs you. B)
Not to mention I had the munchies VERY bad and I didn't eat anything that whole day, and it certainly didn't make me go mad to go find food or anything dumb like you suggested.
"A new take on the epic fantasy genre... Darkly comic, relatable characters... twisted storyline."
"Readers who prefer tension and romance, Maledictions: The Offering, delivers... As serious YA fiction, I’ll give it five stars out of five. As a novel? Four and a half." - Liz Ellor
I don't play football, i just watch it passionately(and have season tickets to the team in my sig)
I'm not sure how answering all my points with "if you're dumb" or "if you're high" somehow excuses it. The point of smoking weed IS to get high, last time i checked, so how is that an excuse?
That is a colossaly ignorant statement, and by saying it you make obvious that you're under the immensely false impression that all people who use psychoactive substances are the "druggies" in your high school and 30-year-old bums etc.
You are far to ignorant to even suggest that you have any idea what you're talking about.
Just as there are responsible drinkers, there are responsible weed smokers and responsible drug users.
If you can't at least accept this, than you have clearly blindly closed your mind out of primitive and immature instinct simply for the sake of argument (and/or because your gym coach told you to).
Anybody can submit whatever the **** they want to Wikipedia. For all we know you could have wrote all of that up yourself just to say that you're right.
"Critics believe that recreational drug use is inherently irresponsible (in that drug use is potentially dangerous, is a selfish or fruitless escape from reality, and is illegal in many societies) and that drugs can therefore never be used "responsibly"."
That's pretty much why it's irresponsible. It's illegal, stupid, and has consequences... but of course everything that is against drug use is just "propaganda" to you, so of course you won't listen.
And for someone that doesn't believe that .gov is a credible source, then I'm suprised you even look at wikipedia.
Comment