worth addressing

[Alioth]

Re: worth addressing

can this thread just die, it's not gonna produce anything else worth asking or answering I think. I believe we touched on just about everything

You're one to talk with an avatar like that~ Lmao

[choof]

Re: worth addressing

no, because direct links to imgur links just show the image that you've uploaded itself

if you want to search outside of the page linked in a given scenario, that's on you

so you were actually kidding when you said this?

if you post a link and it's found to have any sort of adult content, you're breaking the rules by posting it, intentional or not. Why is that so hard for 20+ year olds to understand, seriously?

or maybe you're just being a little too ambiguous

[Untimely Friction]

Re: worth addressing

can I report you for your avatar mister local moderator

Despite the fact that in a prior post I already stated I asked 3 admins to use it? It's not nsfw, the male figure especially a mans breast are not seen as a sexual part in the same way other body parts are in pornography, on top of this ezreal just wants to get his chocolate dumplings back from tarics nipples, nbd and not really nsfw afaik, it's especially not porn.

I took every step possible to ensure I could use such an avatar, the same discretion which I could say many others have not followed and as such got banned for posting porn.

[One Winged Angel]

Re: worth addressing

At least people here are actually grasping the concept that unless a subforum demographic is restricted to 18+, posting porn will always be banworthy. It doesn't matter that 'most people' on here are of age.

Putting an age restriction on TGB is something the admins would need to talk over, but ultimately I don't think Synth would get behind making certain parts of the site more restrictive, especially if this is the driving force behind doing it.

[choof]

Re: worth addressing

a mans breast are not seen as a sexual part in the same way other body parts are in pornography, on top of this ezreal just wants to get his chocolate dumplings back from tarics nipples, nbd and not really nsfw afaik, it's especially not porn.

your avatar is literally gay foreplay

[dAnceguy117]

Re: worth addressing

can this thread just die, it's not gonna produce anything else worth asking or answering I think. I believe we touched on just about everything

why stifle a discussion, given the posting rate and the viewer count?

[Untimely Friction]

Re: worth addressing

your avatar is literally gay foreplay

Theres no explicit pornography... you're really losing the point here choof...

why stifle a discussion, given the posting rate and the viewer count?

Because questions have been answered, but as prawn MUCH earlier said this is -NOT- worth addressing, so long as it is however I'm going to keep answering questions as best I can, cause why not, while consistently avoiding my own personal opinions and sticking to the facts and rules already set in place. I do think this is pointless, but I also think this is a great way for me to excercise my brain right after waking up.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: worth addressing

so you were actually kidding when you said this?



or maybe you're just being a little too ambiguous

imgur.com/xxxxx != i.imgur.com/xxxxx.png

imgur.com/xxxxx = indirect linking and shows "images of the day" in addition to what you linked

i.imgur.com/xxxxx.png = direct linking, only shows the image in question that is intended to be linked

if you make a direct link and it has adult content, it's grounds for infraction/banishment; if you make an indirect link and it has adult content, it's grounds for infraction/banishment

again, I don't comprehend why this is such a difficult concept for people to understand.

[Wafles]

Re: worth addressing

why the fuck do people want to post porn on ffr
who cares
not worth addressing. if the admins dont want it here then thats the end of the story.

[Alioth]

Re: worth addressing

Despite the fact that in a prior post I already stated I asked 3 admins to use it? It's not nsfw, the male figure especially a mans breast are not seen as a sexual part in the same way other body parts are in pornography, on top of this ezreal just wants to get his chocolate dumplings back from tarics nipples, nbd and not really nsfw afaik, it's especially not porn.

I took every step possible to ensure I could use such an avatar, the same discretion which I could say many others have not followed and as such got banned for posting porn.

oh jesus lmaoooo i'm not even going to touch that subject because of the fuckery

[choof]

Re: worth addressing

imgur.com/xxxxx != i.imgur.com/xxxxx.png

imgur.com/xxxxx = indirect linking and shows "images of the day" in addition to what you linked

i.imgur.com/xxxxx.png = direct linking, only shows the image in question that is intended to be linked

if you make a direct link and it has adult content, it's grounds for infraction/banishment; if you make an indirect link and it has adult content, it's grounds for infraction/banishment

it takes 3 seconds to delete the ".jpg," which will turn your direct link into an indirect link and that's well in the 5 Second Window; it's close enough to an indirect link to be a bannable offense

again, I don't comprehend why this is such a difficult concept for people to understand.

stepmania

[Charu]

Re: worth addressing

Wait, why is this an issue?

Porn should most definitely not be posted within this website unless the website itself is geared towards things of adult nature. Can't just scratch that because of one specific subforum.

This website is geared to one thing and one thing only, a flash rhythm game based off DDR.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: worth addressing

It comes down to certain users trying to utilize loopholes in the rules so that they can post 18+ content in areas of the site where rules are not strictly followed. In reality, that section of the site is completely useless and tends to harbor those who have little to no interest in the game as a whole, in addition to being an area that generally fosters trolling/flaming/low-quality content/(etc).

With that being said, this really isn't something that needs to be discussed, and the rules don't need to be changed. I'm not letting this go on any further -- FFR isn't a dump for you to post whatever you want; if you don't play FFR or care to congregate with the other users and just want to use the site to post your random garbage or shit-talk other users, you should go elsewhere.

Charu/Wafles hit it best on the head, there's nothing more to it. I'll leave the thread open if people want to legitimately provide reasoning by why this is alright, but this thread likely won't stay open for long.

[Kekeb]

Re: worth addressing

TC_PassiveAggressive

[Litodude]

Re: worth addressing

from the list of currently active users below i'm going to click 2 buttons and follow links that are ONLY on FFR, of profiles, that can be made to argue are NSFW brb