i would legit not be surprised if rog hasn't selected a file to queue yet rofl
i picked unpause the heat because that was the only 2 of my charts that could be salvaged into something playable. i've got a lot of fixes to do before it's ready to be put in-game, and also, more important things to do than worry about stepmania. it might take another month or so.
I saw a flyer on a bulletin board at school asking for high-functioning aspergers/autism people to participate in some kind of experiment, and all I could think was, that sounds like a great place to meet girls.
submitting my This Will Be The Day (James Landino Remix) chart from Step Con as a normal batch submission, since I (rightfully) missed the chance to have it queue'd as a prize from that contest
if anyone has a problem with it, I really don't care
Got some more supplemental judgments in last night. Only files still needing some will most likely not be getting SAP, so I can update the spreadsheet now with these numbers. Note that conditionally queued files that did not have fixes sent in have now become resubmissions.
I don't even know if PrawnSkunk ever saw that his file got conditionally queued ... So because of my own lack of communication, I'll still let his file into the queue if he sends it in again soon and doesn't want it to go through the batch again.
Point of clarification: why does being CQ'ed not award SAP? I would think that if the file is fixed within the given CQ window to a satisfactory standard, then SAP should be awarded. Honestly it's all kinda academic since SAP matters about as much as credits, but it's kinda strange.
For instance, if I submit a file that's worth an 8 average (like pisscord in this case), that does not preclude my file from having some obvious objective errors that I might have overlooked (due to tunneling in on the way I think a file should be stepped when there's an obviously better way or whatever). Certainly these objective errors justify some kind of penalty, but that penalty is already levied on the score a judge gives to my file.
Point of clarification: why does being CQ'ed not award SAP? I would think that if the file is fixed within the given CQ window to a satisfactory standard, then SAP should be awarded. Honestly it's all kinda academic since SAP matters about as much as credits, but it's kinda strange.
That's because these files were not fixed within the CQ window. The CQ files that were fixed (For UltraPlayers, Sanctuary of pantheon, Highway Highway DESTINY, Hello, and Palace of Destruction) all received SAP.
If PISSCORD does get judged again and only gets in the 6.7-7.5 range the next time, I will consider giving it the two SAP it would have received the first time. It would be the nice thing to do, but I'm not sure if that's actually fair. Maybe I'll take the average of the two final ratings and see where that puts it. Four ratings isn't necessarily a representative sample of the whole team, but we don't really have the power to do much more in a timely manner.
Are there any updates with the files mentioned here:
Originally posted by XelNya
These files:
[Resubmission] They Kiddnapped The Princess
La Tristesse Durera Toujours
Nightfall (Original Mix)
Where skipped or something along that line somehwhere. I've carefully checked the batch review thread like 3 times on at least 3 occasions to be absolutely sure, so something happened to these somewhere.
I can't find the sent e-mail (as lol it deletes itself.) but I am 100% sure I sent it because I sent in the monstercat song (Nightfall) during the time where the credit event was going on. If someone could figure this out if it was never sent or whatever I'd appreciate it.
Trying to figure it out now because they're sitting in my "in batch" folder which I place them there so I know what's been sent recently. I just wanna know if I need to send them another time.
Originally posted by Silvuh
Ohh my gosh, wow, I'm sorry, I don't know how I missed it! Yeah, you sent an e-mail to regularffrsubmissions on June 1st with Nightfall and They Kidnapped the Princess. Soon after getting access to the e-mail, I went through and labeled everything for the two latest batches, and I totally missed this one somehow, probably because the e-mail contained files that weren't in the batch, and I didn't stop to think, "Oh wait, maybe they should be!"
I'm going to start keeping a record of all the dates for when the e-mails are open for different things, and that should help in keeping things like this from happening.
However, I'm not seeing an e-mail with La Tristesse Durera Toujours in it; the next e-mail from you I see was sent on September 4th. If maybe you sent it to the wrong address or something, you can forward that sent e-mail to here. If it was originally sent during the right time period, I can let it be judged with this batch. But for now, I will make sure that your other two files get to the judges.
Sorry I still haven't posted ratings. When going through the notes for accepted files, I keep getting stuck on my own files, feeling like I need to make all the fixes then and there. It's been more difficult than usual this time, and I shouldn't have let myself get sidetracked like that. (Also, I've been working on a number of other things and need to get back to doing this, sorry.)
I mean the La Triste sent e-mail I never found so I'm cool sending that in another batch, it's more the other two I'm curious about. Thanks
Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun beep
Comment