Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[MarioNintendo]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

OMFG, OMFG, LOLWUT, OMFG.

Xkur:
Psychoangel691 [+]: Well you already know this is my fave file from you. There's really not much to point out the only thing I see to mention is the jump at the end of the burst in m72 forces a mini-jack but it's completely doable so no big deal there.
dore [++]: fun as hell, like the red note thingies a lot
Who_Cares973 [+]: im sure this song has an actual song title rofl try getting it. file was fun and those speedups were a nice touch
Bmah [+]: Whoa, crazy speedups! How did you figure these out?
- Some ghost 16ths in areas like the second half of m2,8, should be avoided; just focus on the main melody.
- Technical stuff: probably misplaced jump at beat 35.25,258.25; 16ths, not 24ths at the end of m17; 32nds, not 24ths, at the end of m25; sound at beat 165 lags a bit; probably don't need 16th at beat 185.25; missed 8th at beat 188.50; missed 16th at beat 218.25; missed some arrows at last measure; also don't need jump at the very end
- suggestion: Just little minor things. Unique file. Love those speed-ups!

... dies happy

:'''''''''')

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

No, jimerax determines that (maybe it'll be the same, who knows). Due to the differing opinions of judges, the cutoff line changes. Some batches might be more lenient/stricter than others.

[iironiic]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Oh my... my file made it...

:')

This ^ I was surprised Obscene got in :O

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

OMFG, OMFG, LOLWUT, OMFG.

Xkur:
Psychoangel691 [+]: Well you already know this is my fave file from you. There's really not much to point out the only thing I see to mention is the jump at the end of the burst in m72 forces a mini-jack but it's completely doable so no big deal there.
dore [++]: fun as hell, like the red note thingies a lot
Who_Cares973 [+]: im sure this song has an actual song title rofl try getting it. file was fun and those speedups were a nice touch
Bmah [+]: Whoa, crazy speedups! How did you figure these out?
- Some ghost 16ths in areas like the second half of m2,8, should be avoided; just focus on the main melody.
- Technical stuff: probably misplaced jump at beat 35.25,258.25; 16ths, not 24ths at the end of m17; 32nds, not 24ths, at the end of m25; sound at beat 165 lags a bit; probably don't need 16th at beat 185.25; missed 8th at beat 188.50; missed 16th at beat 218.25; missed some arrows at last measure; also don't need jump at the very end
- suggestion: Just little minor things. Unique file. Love those speed-ups!

... dies happy

:'''''''''')

dude... +1 for the ++, +2 18/20, +1 20/20, and +10 for getting a file in the queue!

BEAST

[kommisar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

congrats man

[i love you]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

awesome job bro

[psychoangel691]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

OMFG, OMFG, LOLWUT, OMFG.

Xkur:
Psychoangel691 [+]: Well you already know this is my fave file from you. There's really not much to point out the only thing I see to mention is the jump at the end of the burst in m72 forces a mini-jack but it's completely doable so no big deal there.
dore [++]: fun as hell, like the red note thingies a lot
Who_Cares973 [+]: im sure this song has an actual song title rofl try getting it. file was fun and those speedups were a nice touch
Bmah [+]: Whoa, crazy speedups! How did you figure these out?
- Some ghost 16ths in areas like the second half of m2,8, should be avoided; just focus on the main melody.
- Technical stuff: probably misplaced jump at beat 35.25,258.25; 16ths, not 24ths at the end of m17; 32nds, not 24ths, at the end of m25; sound at beat 165 lags a bit; probably don't need 16th at beat 185.25; missed 8th at beat 188.50; missed 16th at beat 218.25; missed some arrows at last measure; also don't need jump at the very end
- suggestion: Just little minor things. Unique file. Love those speed-ups!

... dies happy

:'''''''''')

Congrats <3 I wasn't kidding when I had said "psychoangel691 said: you're gonna be one hell of a stepartist." like you have in your sig there. You already have such a strong grasp on things and you're only gonna get better. Can't wait to see more from you.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

on another note

bmah, you cockblocked my 20/20 </3

[Plan_Bsk81127]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

eek, think my resubmitted file barely got through. Thanks for mah ? kommi. =]

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I must say, there were a lot of varying opinions in this batch, and for varying reasons. I don't think simply tallying up points is going to do it this time.

@Halo:

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

@Halo:

On another note though, I'm really happy that it got 19/20; that boosts my simfile points up two, which means I can send 4 files now.

[Plan_Bsk81127]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Word. I got a [+] and a [?] on the same file.

I got a ++ and a ? on my resubmission. XD My file was good and bad at the same time.

[ichliebekase]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Hey, last batch I got a + and - on the same file. TWICE. You guys got nothing on me :]

I must say, there were a lot of varying opinions in this batch, and for varying reasons. I don't think simply tallying up points is going to do it this time.

This makes me feel a lot better.

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

so baq stepped that file then. That explains the patterns.

Yeah I'm submitting a v2. We need another ridiculously hard skill token


and rebound: for the third time, the version I linked on youtube is NOT the one I stepped. I stepped the same one. I just happened to see that other version and thought it was funny

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Batch is open now.

Submission Deadline is 11:59:59 PM(CST/Server Time), Feb 7, 2011.

After this batch, regular submission will be closed for a while.