PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

[NFD]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

Yes, yes. I realize that. But I do not agree that someone should be appraised or treated differently in a positive way for being homosexual either. If I were to participate in this, it would most likely be misconstrued and twisted into my support of the lifestyle in some way.



I don't believe homosexuality is something that happens in the fetus one bit. They have not fully proved it scientifically. If they are able to change some hormones in a dog or some other animal and make it homosexual, then I will believe it.

Also, retardation is not a lifestyle. Retardation is a disability. Do you consider homosexuality a disability? ;D

I am disabled. ):

[-zeroSKILL-]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

sounds gayer than two men ****in'.

im in.

[stretchypanda]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

Original sin is still very much a tenet of, at least, the Catholic faith. Hence the need for infant baptism; it cleanses them of original sin.


--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

Silly Catholics. Suffer unto me the little children.

[funmonkey54]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

Infant baptism is dumb.

The child has no say in it whatsoever.
I mean, I believe baptism is a good thing, but I believe getting baptized should be a choice made by a person with free will. Also, the idea of un-baptized people going to hell. Who is to say that there was not still a healthy relationship between God and that person? But because they weren't dipped in some "blessed" water, they go to hell? Baptism is a thing of respect and just to sort of show that you are taking the step to follow God, not a required thing. >.>

[jellygod]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

ehhh i dunno, itd be hard going a whole day without talking

[SithCait22]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

I won't be participating. I find this to be so utterly retarded. I, myself, am gay and this just gives the people who have a problem with queers something that they want, all of them to just stop talking. It would be like all the queers are gone to them, no more queers YAY!
I'm going to continue being me, since it's been working for me.

[nuclearsamurai]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

ehhh i dunno, itd be hard going a whole day without talking

Same for me, but meh. I could always try.

[~HentaiXXX~]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

It's not as hard as you would think, I've tried it, didn't really have any problems, besides my friends trying with their best efforts to get me to talk.

[nuclearsamurai]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

I know a lot of people this year, but meh.

This will be my third year doing this now.

[1mpuls3]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

Idk. The only reason I use to do the day of silence was to be able to not do anything in school. I know its a good cause but it really doesn't do much in my opinion. Its more of like a respect thing then anything else i personally think but idk. Maybe im just randomly blabbering. I think speaking about it and spreading the word would be more helpful but maybe silence is strong too. Idk

[Veumgea]

Re: PARTlClPAT3 - 2009

You don't stay silent the entire day, you only say silent for a work day. Which is normally like 6-9 hours. Usually 7 or 8. Then you break the silence.