Re: MapleStory
Jason asked me the same thing in game. Yes, I mean his hit rate with a magic skill, not any sort of accuracy stat.
And Tosh, the point of it isn't to say "luk is better than lukless". In fact, I'd say the minor difference of accuracy should never be the deciding factor here. The popular idea is that lukless has more accuracy, but do people choose lukless because of that? No.
Fact is that 9 times out of 10, a lukless will do more damage.
The only point here is to prove that lukless does not have more accuracy and that luk DOES help luk mages more than simply making them lose less exp when they die.
ps anyone interested in luk as magic accuracy, check out the thread I linked to before. In that thread someone links to a thread at hidden-street.net in which a person posts images of a level 28 pure luk mage attacking monsters and not missing.
Jason asked me the same thing in game. Yes, I mean his hit rate with a magic skill, not any sort of accuracy stat.
And Tosh, the point of it isn't to say "luk is better than lukless". In fact, I'd say the minor difference of accuracy should never be the deciding factor here. The popular idea is that lukless has more accuracy, but do people choose lukless because of that? No.
Fact is that 9 times out of 10, a lukless will do more damage.
The only point here is to prove that lukless does not have more accuracy and that luk DOES help luk mages more than simply making them lose less exp when they die.
ps anyone interested in luk as magic accuracy, check out the thread I linked to before. In that thread someone links to a thread at hidden-street.net in which a person posts images of a level 28 pure luk mage attacking monsters and not missing.
Hunting for tobis will do this to you.
Comment