Re: "Chart" not "Step"
You're conflating two ideas. The amount of effort it takes to adopt the change is trivial, but the impact it has on the community and the game is not. I argue that the impact is significant (and even if it isn't, my point that it makes more sense still stands), and therefore if there is no reason to NOT change, then we should change.
Wafles is an example of someone who got heated over a suggestion, even though he makes no argument for why he holds his position. Which is totally separate from the right to hold that position. It's like me advising him not to drink rat poison, but although he doesn't have a reason to drink it, he gets mad at me saying he has the right to do what he wants. (Except obviously the severity of the two issues is totally different.)
You're conflating two ideas. The amount of effort it takes to adopt the change is trivial, but the impact it has on the community and the game is not. I argue that the impact is significant (and even if it isn't, my point that it makes more sense still stands), and therefore if there is no reason to NOT change, then we should change.
Wafles is an example of someone who got heated over a suggestion, even though he makes no argument for why he holds his position. Which is totally separate from the right to hold that position. It's like me advising him not to drink rat poison, but although he doesn't have a reason to drink it, he gets mad at me saying he has the right to do what he wants. (Except obviously the severity of the two issues is totally different.)





Comment