Re: FFR Community Pack 4 Released!
yeah wc pretty much got this
I don't know why kommi is so buttmad but technicality is not an extreme. a file is not black and white, technical or not technical. it's how to effectively use things that we have established will HELP make a chart more fun, such as pitch relevance
ps pitch relevance is not let's squeeze an entire song into a 4 key piano it's placing notes such that the melodic contour is acknowledged and the notes are not placed randomly
expanding on this if anyone cares to read:
this is the same thing for all mediums of art. there is no piece of art that is purely technical or purely expressive, because there will always be some degree of subjectivity in the interpretation and there must be some sort of technical ability that went into the making of the art. someone with an acute ear might hear a subtle dissonance in a piece of music that was not meant to be there, pointing it out for the artist. this is not a nitpick that will make the music "technical to the point where it's not enjoyable to listen to," it's an improvement made to an already enjoyable piece. if someone points out that a piece of art has a disproportionate body somewhere, it doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad piece of art or it's unappealing, and fixing it certainly won't make it any worse. most importantly, it makes the artist aware of where he needs to improve technically if he wants to better his craft.
example: jimerax is known for his very "technical" style of charting, but he has made a lot of good stuff and he does stick to what he believes is fun to play, and no matter how you look at it he has drastically improved a lot of my charts thanks to a lot of edits that he was capable of that I wasn't
also this:
overrated quote that states the obvious
you could just "place notes where you feel like it as long as it's fun" but that doesn't necessarily make you a great or even good artist. great artists understand that there is a degree of technical ability that goes into the art of the craft and using that ability well and that technical ability it not the only thing that matters. you can't do calculus without first understanding basic math. you can't efficiently cook a complex dish without knowing the basics of cooking. you can't write a novel until you learn to read. anyone that doesn't acknowledge these things can turn out to be QED, thinking he's good but actually having 0 technical ability. the only thing that separates him from someone like us is previous experience and examples, and in that case we are still influenced by the technical ability of others through emulation, so i don't see what you're trying to get at
the days where people over-analyze or "abuse technicality" are long gone (haha longgone), at least in the sm community that I'm observing now kpce i made my point
yeah wc pretty much got this
I don't know why kommi is so buttmad but technicality is not an extreme. a file is not black and white, technical or not technical. it's how to effectively use things that we have established will HELP make a chart more fun, such as pitch relevance
ps pitch relevance is not let's squeeze an entire song into a 4 key piano it's placing notes such that the melodic contour is acknowledged and the notes are not placed randomly
expanding on this if anyone cares to read:
this is the same thing for all mediums of art. there is no piece of art that is purely technical or purely expressive, because there will always be some degree of subjectivity in the interpretation and there must be some sort of technical ability that went into the making of the art. someone with an acute ear might hear a subtle dissonance in a piece of music that was not meant to be there, pointing it out for the artist. this is not a nitpick that will make the music "technical to the point where it's not enjoyable to listen to," it's an improvement made to an already enjoyable piece. if someone points out that a piece of art has a disproportionate body somewhere, it doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad piece of art or it's unappealing, and fixing it certainly won't make it any worse. most importantly, it makes the artist aware of where he needs to improve technically if he wants to better his craft.
example: jimerax is known for his very "technical" style of charting, but he has made a lot of good stuff and he does stick to what he believes is fun to play, and no matter how you look at it he has drastically improved a lot of my charts thanks to a lot of edits that he was capable of that I wasn't
also this:
overrated quote that states the obvious
The best chefs have narrowed it down to "does it taste good" and "is it appealing to look at". That's literally everything any casual customer will care about or even most critics. People eat shit that's good.
The best musicians have narrowed it down to "does it sound nice" and "is it enjoyable to listen to". That's literally everything any casual listener will care about or even most experienced people. People listen to shit that's good.
the days where people over-analyze or "abuse technicality" are long gone (haha longgone), at least in the sm community that I'm observing now kpce i made my point
Comment