for people who have an average of 85 in regular songs but don't subscribe, their average would only be increased by about 0.05 from subscriber songs, currently. for people who have an average rank around 20, it would probably raise their average rank maybe 2 points. maybe the requirement should be 90 for non-subscribers, or something else much closer to 85, because it doesn't affect people at that level that much. even with future subscribers coming in, i think it would take 605 subscribers or something playing every song for someone's average rank to go from 85 to 100.
Can you just leave mine at a constant "9.xx"? It always changes, depending on the # of songs released exclusively to subscribers. It doesn't go above 10.xx unless I've left a newly released song unplayed for a few days, and it doesn't go below 9.xx unless there are less subscriber-only songs.
Actually, everyone in the non-subscriber list will eventually go up or stay the same because more people will subscribe and play the songs, causing more ranks on those songs, etc.
Yeah, that's what I mean. If the majority of the subscribers have played the unreleased songs (at their normal number), my rank will be above 10.xx. However, when one of the subscriber songs is finally released, and I play it, my rank drops back down to 9ish, hence the 9.xx.
What I'm saying is that since my average rank is at any given time anywhere from upper 8's to 10+, you should just leave it at 9.xx, since it always changes due to the existence of the subscriber songs. Everybody else on the non-subscriber list also has this problem, but it's only noticeable at lower average ranks like mine, because rank 200 or 300 on a song makes a MUCH bigger impact on an average rank of 9 than it does on an average rank of 90.
Comment