Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[MooMoo_Cowfreak]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

stavie: don't blame me. get your file right the first time or re-submit it with fixes. not my fault jx didn't see your comments in the thread about the file. clearly blu did.

silvuh: sure

moomoo: when did you send um? if after 10/21, they'll be in this batch

coolgamer: i got your file on 11/12 and again today. i don't need you to send it more than once. and i'm not going to confirm that i got it... takes too long, too much effort, etc.

Yeah I did, I'll just send it again.

EDIT: It is tasselfoot@gmail .com right?

[stavie33]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

stavie: don't blame me. get your file right the first time or re-submit it with fixes. not my fault jx didn't see your comments in the thread about the file. clearly blu did.

Alright, thanks, and if you noticed, I did e-mail you a fixed version, but you said it didn't make it in time, so oh well, next time, and blu knew about the music thing, but couldn't understand why I stepped it that way without hearing the bass, snare, and symbols all at once, but it's cool, I'll send it again with a few changes

[stavie33]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

PATASHU!! DO NOT PLAY THE FILE I SENT YOU! I found the sync error! The beat offset was off by like, .5, or something, anywho, it's synced now and sounds MUCH better, I wish I could just resend now to the judges and have them do it quickly with better audio and stuff instead of waiting through an entire batch because my audio file I sent made it a day late, also, Patashu, sending you the better file now

[behanjc]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Offset errors don't matter in terms of judging, and VERY likely was not the sync error(s) the judges referred to.

Offsets for different people vary, and is easy for the judges to change if they feel necessary.

Sync errors usually refer to wrong BPM or wrong notes/rhythms

However, I am speaking generally, and since the judges didn't even play the file, I could be wrong.

[kommisar[os]]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

behan we should collab between us canadians

[Xandertrax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Gym Leader (RBY)

jx-felt it lacks the layer for bass drum inconsistently (mainly 4ths)

blu-missed some synth 8th notes in some parts, listen carefully

I'm not entirely sure what you guys mean by this. Can you give measure examples, so I can get this back in to tass?

Slow Down

jx-could be layered better imo, also felt a bit long

What parts? Also, I cut the last minute out. that should be better. Just kinda makes it one-hand biased now, since it doesn't repeat.

Tass, I'll re-send Gym Leader once I fix it up a bit more. Sent you the fixed dwi for Tears of Remorse.

P.S. Can I send in 3 new files and 2 resubmits you didn't see?

[DarkZtar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Crap, my computer did screw up the files... (sent the exact same file as last time) >_< Oh well, fixing the stuff again. :/

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

okay it actually is good, one thing I'd definitely change though is the right handed 16th jacks near the beginning; way harder than anything else in the file

[sc979]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Oh crap, I just realized that one of the songs that I sent in for the next batch has 2 charts.

Use the oni chart, not the edit. Also, I realize that I have to cut out the first 40 seconds that I didn't step, but not doing that until I see how it does.

Or do I have to resend it?

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

xander: that's fine

sc979: if you have 40 sec of blank to start a file and it has 2 charts... your best bet is to re-send it.

[HighAndr0id]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Robertsona

theres your problem


jk chill dude

anyway fixed everything in my file blu and jx, resubmitting with 2-3 more files for next batch.

[robertsona]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

even if it was a joke, it still has to have a little truth/meaning to it, what is the meaning? am i known to be a bad stepper?

[stavie33]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Offset errors don't matter in terms of judging, and VERY likely was not the sync error(s) the judges referred to.

Offsets for different people vary, and is easy for the judges to change if they feel necessary.

Sync errors usually refer to wrong BPM or wrong notes/rhythms

However, I am speaking generally, and since the judges didn't even play the file, I could be wrong.

Just to be specific, my song is easy because since I have the original sheet music and the mp3 is played off of the computer program that designed it, and it was made at 150 BPM, it is perfectly at 150BPM, and since I have the sheet music in front of me when stepping this, the notes/rhythms are exactly the same as the song, and trust me, it sounds that way, no one graded it seriously (or even could have if they tried) due to the audio quality, hence why I was so adamant about always reminding them to try the new file or make the volume really loud, but it's okay, next time it'll get in for sure

[stavie33]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

okay it actually is good, one thing I'd definitely change though is the right handed 16th jacks near the beginning; way harder than anything else in the file

see, my file doesn't suck, at all! It just had a bad audio file, I believe the judges will completely change their minds after playing it again, so much that I'm willing to bet that if I send it in to JX and Blu now for a quick review, they will give it 5+, and I'll bet on that

EDIT: Tass, are you willing to bet that score on a resubmit, and if I lose, I get banned for a week and credits wiped?

[Xandertrax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Stavie, if you double-post one more time, I'm personally going to hack tass' account just to ban you.

Seriously. It's really obnoxious. just edit your first post.