Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[t-rogdor]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

ps - rogdor... tell v2 was WAY offsync when we started it... look at my AAA replay for when we fixed the sync. good advice: always look at the most recent replay.

I did look at the most recent replay when i said that.

It was just that i was getting pyched out by the jumps that WERENT there. (ala: it was understepped on the jumps. the part with alot of trills. Needed alot more jumps.)

[i love gabba]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

KaMONe 100%- OH GOD IT'S EHHS ALL OVER AGAIN PLEASE STOP THE HIGH PITCH TALKING!

IMO, There might be a Kamone 100% v2, easier maybe. btw, it's not really high pitch talking.

[EnR]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

IMO, There might be a Kamone 100% v2, easier maybe. btw, it's not really high pitch talking.

They have it spelt, "Kagome", they should fix that >_>

[jugglinguy]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

first of all, by having 6 panel on ffr we're sparking interest. I'm pretty sure if ffr started out as 5 panel or something you guys wouldn't be complaining today. it's about INTEREST, not trying to stay away from sm

FFRock =)

and the only reason you guys say that no one cares about solo is because not enough people play it and you've never tried it yourself.

Actually I used to a bunch just for jumpstream practice, but now, not so much.

besides, we've hit a dead end with 4 panels. people have become so good that the only noteworthy scores are mashfests or ridiculous AAAA's of color note fests. most all of the stepping techniques have been already done by someone, and just about every type of song you can name has been stepped before

Hey stargroup has a good point!




ONTOPIC: =D

[Silver_Brian]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Edit: Shash, you back for good? You should be a judge. From what I heard, you did a really good job back then as a judge. 3 FFR judges would be a good thing.

uh, they have 3 judges right now.

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

wow... it is Kamone... i've read that as Kagome forever. Damn you Kagome!

fixed.

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

ps - jx sent me his notes. time to start judging.

[Xx{Midday}xX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

wut is Kamone? Sounds Japanese ish.

かもねネ100% by DJ Sharpnel?

That would be Kamonene 100%. You're all wrong wut.

Kamonene 100% Tass, fix again. Unless if I'm looking at somewhere completely different or something.

YONDEROME The Megamixxx of Sharpnelsound 1-7. Track 6 right.

All the sites that have English names are all wrong as far as I can see. His own site says what I said.

jx amirite. Da proof.

[stargroup100]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

that still only represents .01% of the players, if not less. even the vast majority of SM players can't do that on the majority of files.

the problem is that the forums cater to the loyal long-time users and the really good users. rarely, if ever, do you hear the opinions from the average, casual, or crappy players. and, realize it or not... they're the vast majority.

Personally, the only thing I want as a player is for more 11's and 12's to be in the game, which is something I've been trying to accomplish with my own files (ML and Brandish are both very high 11's, and HO is a 12).

how would this support the majority of ffr users? there's a contradiction here

The ridiculously vast majority of the site, including many of the high tier players (like myself), are fine with 4 arrows. I absolutely guarantee you that 6-panel on FFR could never reach a tenth the popularity that 4-panel already has, and that's what really matters in the end.

this is like a bunch of people disliking chocolate because they've never tried it and don't feel like trying anything new

For a game with actual depth and technique to its gameplay, play Guitar Hero or something. FFR = 4 panels, and I see no reason to change that.

and this is kinda stupid, no offense

you know what, I'm tired of arguing. as long as solo will eventually be implemented somewhere in the not-too-far future I'll be happy

[Coolboyrulez0]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

how would this support the majority of ffr users? there's a contradiction here

Hehe you sounded like Phoenix Wright
+1 cool point for you.
Also IF Solo ever gets implanted to FFR, I will be sure to give it a try.
I'm just too lazy to change my settings and DL packs for SM solo

Also, Tass, when do you think you will be done?

btw midday: hope that's not considered lolicon or your b&

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

it's Kamonene 100%

also,
beh - Iii
blu - i
bm - i
dor - ii
h19 - i
kom - I
mg - i
npv - i
sc9 - i
sg - Ii
si - i

[hi19hi19]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Solo is fun. Implementing it for FFR would be hell and most people on the site would be like "wtf is this ****" and then it would have a very small dedicated group of players like SIU used to have and then it would die just like SIU has and overall it would be a massive waste of time.

Solo = ODI-headed SM-only circlejerk. Just leave it that way

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

basically what hi19 said. and, stargroup... never did i say solo would ever be in FFR... there are so many more things to do before it's even considered. so, DEFINITELY not in any kind of short term.

maybe 2-3 years from now? who knows? no clue.


ps - i have 24 files to test... starting now. 11 +d by both, 8 +d by jx, 5 +d by blu. most of jx's 8 were "semi-accept" too.

[Netjet!]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

darn. back to the stepping board.

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

25% done... but i have a rule about not playing much FFR/SM before bowling. tires me out too much. so i'll play another few files in a bit... but i won't have this finished until after bowling. expect batch notes late tonight PST or tomorrow.