Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Almost finished.

15,561 frames; just barely plays for the older engines without issues, hahaha

I am very interested to see what this is.

[Tidus810]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

15,561 frames; just barely plays for the older engines without issues, hahaha

I am very interested to see what this is.

You can play-test it if you'd like.

[DossarLX ODI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

You people make me sick

If the very long songs have a lot of easier sections and sudden spikes, then I 100% agree with this.

[samurai7694]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

lol syncing took 1.5 hours and charting took about 30-45 minutes. Sending in Tetris - Powerglove. (and maybe send in some easier charts soon enough)

[mi40]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

powerglove

[Zaevod]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Is this steppable? http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/536553

I'm not sure if it would make a really good file if most of the hard parts would be just 200 bpm streams or jumpstreams.

[Xiz]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Is this steppable? http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/536553

I'm not sure if it would make a really good file if most of the hard parts would be just 200 bpm streams or jumpstreams.

I have found that if your file answers yes to these questions, then it is:

1) Is it a fun song?
2) Does the song go somewhere?
3) Will others enjoy playing/listening to this song?

If you answer yes to these three questions, then go for it!

[mi40]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

the fast parts are barely audible and there's no real distinguishing features in the song that would make it memorable so i wouldnt say yes :/

[Xiz]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

the fast parts are barely audible and there's no real distinguishing features in the song that would make it memorable so i wouldnt say yes :/

If the mix was different, then perhaps. However, I am not a fan of Midi tracks in game... ya know? It needs that oomph... that flavor... that mmmmm....

[mi40]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

skrillex has oomph

[Xiz]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

skrillex has oomph

Well, that's the 'oomph' that you get after you get thunder-punched in the crotch and vomit profusely. It's different.

[Zaevod]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

the fast parts are barely audible and there's no real distinguishing features in the song that would make it memorable so i wouldnt say yes :/

Strange, I can hear the fast parts perfectly well.

I don't think it's generic sounding, either, but maybe I'm biased. Whatever...

[mi40]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

when the guys are going to be hitting 200bpm stream/jumpstream those sounds will be drowned out (even on high volume) i think..

[Zaevod]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

If the mix was different, then perhaps. However, I am not a fan of Midi tracks in game... ya know? It needs that oomph... that flavor... that mmmmm....

No, I don't know. Most of the sounds are sampled. What's wrong with the mix?

Am I listening to something completely different? Am I insane?

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

For the recently deleted posts: we're always trying to feature new artists onto FFR. Regardless of tastes, they should feel welcome to make music for this site. It's a shame that some are being discouraged like this.