Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

4/5 nb

[mi40]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

2/3 + 1/3 resub = 1

gg son gg

time to get dat chipscape in-game

[hi19hi19]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

lol 2/5


im so bad at steps gg

[popsicle_3000]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

0/2 not bad for 1st submission

[VisD]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

2/4

ok

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

Either explain a complete justified reason for starting at a 9 / 10 that pertains to my chart, or change your rating properly.

The reasoning behind starting at a 9/10 is actually quite simple, and I do this to every file, not just yours. I'm not the only judge who does this, either.

If a file is a [++] / [10/10], it has to have something special that actually makes me increase from the base rating. For me, bmah's Gynandromorph file was a fantastic example of this -- it was a very fluent file for a strange song that actually made 100% sense, and it utilized excellent 192nd usage. I was going to give it a 9/10, but the appropriate 192nd note usage made the file that much better for me, so I gave bmah the perfect score. If I can't find any reasons to deduct from a file, but can't find anything discernibly neat/awesome about it, I'm going to give it a 9/10 (see in my notes: Lost, Nanairopanda 32-bit).

Off to work for now, be back in five hours (short shift today).

[SKG_Scintill]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

3/3

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

I start every file at 5/10. I start by assuming every file is garbage and go from there.

[NeoMasterPie]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

according to stargroup, 5/10 isn't garbage but just an average file (i somewhat agree with this mentality)

[trumaestro]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

2/2

[iironiic]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

66.666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666...%

I still nb

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

7 would be an average file for me

[trumaestro]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

A few judges mentioned that my files in this batch had the gap off and I wonder if it may be due to this setting in 3.9

The default is -50 ms I think, but I have it set to 0. Maybe it's just due to different settings that my files appear off sync?

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

That's possible

[DossarLX ODI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

That "sound sync" option doesn't appear for my 3.9