Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

Kind of like how my file for I (3 voltage was shit on for no jump
>: (

WASN'T ME

I would have been smart enough to know what voltage on the groove radar meant <3 (don't think I judged the file, haha)

[popsicle_3000]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

just checking that the judges noticed my post about dossar missing a review of one of my songs?

[Xx{Midnight}xX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

fyi: I mentioned difficulty twice in the notes, once for the ending, and once overall -- there's a difference between having a single difficulty spike and then having wavering difficulty all over the place. Your chart starts with a huge mess of 8th jumps at 240, then very little layering, then standard layering, then almost nothing, then a ridiculous jumpstream run where the running stream itself is 16 taps a second, not including the increase in jump density.

I'm sorry that you don't agree with my notes, but it's not like I bombed you -- I even told you what each of the deductions were to prove that I at least had reasoning of it. Honestly, in most other situations, I would have taken off two points for what you did at the ending, because you had an unnecessary color change, and you technically broke the sync too. There's a number of things I could have kept taking off for, like an extreme repetition in jump patterning when you could have accented something different (like using straight jumps but using PR to accent Miku), or how you had a ton of missed percussion sounds in the section afterward, but I didn't do that.

Talking to you about this chart is about the same as talking to a brick wall

It makes no sense and is a waste of time. I got nothing of value from your notes, and frankly I feel your rating is unjustified to be any lower than a 7 based off what I already said. One of your deductions, the automatic starting from a 9, is complete crap. I'm only saying anything because I feel screwed out of a proper review and rating.

Either explain a complete justified reason for starting at a 9 / 10 that pertains to my chart, or change your rating properly.

Next time, if you plan on docking me a free point for no explainable purpose, just pass my chart. People like you should not be reviewing material for the game if that is the sort of garbage you're gonna pull.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

just checking that the judges noticed my post about dossar missing a review of one of my songs?

Was it actually missed or is it a passed file? If it's the latter, then just wait as these passed files are being reviewed.

[AlexDest]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

Just calm down Middie. >_>

[mi40]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

[Choofers]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

Talking to you about this chart is about the same as talking to a brick wall

It makes no sense and is a waste of time. I got nothing of value from your notes, and frankly I feel your rating is unjustified to be any lower than a 7 based off what I already said. One of your deductions, the automatic starting from a 9, is complete crap. I'm only saying anything because I feel screwed out of a proper review and rating.

Either explain a complete justified reason for starting at a 9 / 10 that pertains to my chart, or change your rating properly.

Next time, if you plan on docking me a free point for no explainable purpose, just pass my chart. People like you should not be reviewing material for the game if that is the sort of garbage you're gonna pull.

he starts at 9/10 because no chart is perfect
there's something you can always improve on
and instead of being a pretentious fuck how about you pm him and ask him for an indepth review

I know that might seem odd coming from me due to all my shit about robotomy, but seriously, break away from your shitty internet persona and stop being a bag of dicks

[trumaestro]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

passed files are being reviewed.

Do we have an ETA?

[Xx{Midnight}xX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

Just calm down Middie. >_>

That is me calm. I'm [rightfully] annoyed that a chart I worked hard on is getting denied due to some horrendously garbage reasoning. He's pissed his chart got raped by Kommi's review, but he's doing the same thing to me to a lesser extent by simply deducting a free point.

He has yet to give any solid reasoning for why he is screwing me out of that point, and it is literally the point keeping it from having a passable average before the calculations are completed.

How would you feel if your chart got denied because someone has some garbage thought to start ratings at 9/10? I would hope you'd be at least annoyed enough to speak up.

I worked hard on that chart, all I am asking for is a fair review and chance like everyone should get. Docking points needlessly just takes away the chance people work for. It makes the effort worthless if people can just dock things because they feel like it.

[mi40]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

i worked rly hard on chipscape but it got denited Oopse BUt i Rekognize dat File needs Bige improvements

and dont lie ur files are definitely not the best in the world, far far from it as a matter of fact so y dont u ask for proper reviews and improve instead ??????? ???

like,,,, u KNo wat im sayng pliase

[Choofers]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

His points are totally valid. You're reading way too much into the "start all charts off at 9."

fucen stop

[AlexDest]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

How would you feel if your chart got denied because someone has some garbage thought to start ratings at 9/10? I would hope you'd be at least annoyed enough to speak up.

A 10/10 rating implies that a chart is perfect, and that there's no way it can be improved whatsoever. This is untrue at an objective standpoint because there's always going to be room for improvement no matter what. We don't have an objective way to judge simfiles because we all have our own view on what makes a perfect simfile. Sure, it's your right to question a judge's rating or view on your simfile but if you're going to insult a judge for it on a public forum, then you should probably stop sending simfiles. If you're going to question a judge's notes on your simfile, do so via private messaging or on Skype, AIM, etc.

[rparty89]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

when does the submission close?

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

Do we have an ETA?

Unfortunately files with a [PASS] rating doesn't have a set date when they're completed, but hopefully as soon as possible. I inform this thread when I do update passed files.

when does the submission close?

Submissions do not close. There's a new system of submitting files. Please read the OP.

[mi40]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Batch #1 complete)

but how do you decide the flow of files?

i'm sure the new submission system is bound to receive WAY more files than before since we had batches way less frequently than 2 months