Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[rCaliberGX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I still see a bunch of ghost notes in songs that are already in the game, but yeah I agree ghost notes are kinda lazy

i'm guessing you're looking at legacy/older files? you'll be hard pressed to find ghost notes in the newer files.

[ItsOnlyDanO]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

looks like i've made the backlog worse by submitting a file

[M0nkeyz]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I was kinda thinking since it takes so long for the batch to be full at 120 why not make it --/50 and do it once a month, until there are more judges to help with the batch, because as of right now it takes a really long time, which is kind of annoying for people who really want feedback on their stepfiles.. See right now, I've improved significantly in both my level of play and my feeling of making stepcharts. Yet, im still waiting for one of my first stepcharts to be judged.. which is kind of redundant, because I by now already know what's wrong and right about my earlier submissions, but I don't have any chance to change it anymore.. This could be fixed by just having a smaller batch each month.

[YoshL]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I was kinda thinking since it takes so long for the batch to be full at 120 why not make it --/50 and do it once a month, until there are more judges to help with the batch, because as of right now it takes a really long time, which is kind of annoying for people who really want feedback on their stepfiles.. See right now, I've improved significantly in both my level of play and my feeling of making stepcharts. Yet, im still waiting for one of my first stepcharts to be judged.. which is kind of redundant, because I by now already know what's wrong and right about my earlier submissions, but I don't have any chance to change it anymore.. This could be fixed by just having a smaller batch each month.

lots more extra work on judges behalf. plus, if batch gets behind if it closes monthly, then judges also have pretty much no break. it's judge a month, then judge the next month, etc. plus, there's no guarantee that it'll be 10 files or 100 files in a month. 100 files in 30 days is very hefty, given that judges actually play through the files and give details on what's wrong. It's not a 5 minute process at all.

think more of the big picture than saying "wah /i/ want to get /my/ files in"

2c

[ilikexd]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I was kinda thinking since it takes so long for the batch to be full at 120 why not make it --/50 and do it once a month, until there are more judges to help with the batch, because as of right now it takes a really long time, which is kind of annoying for people who really want feedback on their stepfiles.. See right now, I've improved significantly in both my level of play and my feeling of making stepcharts. Yet, im still waiting for one of my first stepcharts to be judged.. which is kind of redundant, because I by now already know what's wrong and right about my earlier submissions, but I don't have any chance to change it anymore.. This could be fixed by just having a smaller batch each month.

i can help you with your file, and there are also some judges willing to look at it regardless of the fact that they aren't judging it for a batch

[M0nkeyz]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

lots more extra work on judges behalf. plus, if batch gets behind if it closes monthly, then judges also have pretty much no break. it's judge a month, then judge the next month, etc. plus, there's no guarantee that it'll be 10 files or 100 files in a month. 100 files in 30 days is very hefty, given that judges actually play through the files and give details on what's wrong. It's not a 5 minute process at all.

think more of the big picture than saying "wah /i/ want to get /my/ files in"

2c

isn't the batch a bit behind now? they are effectively doing 60 files a month right now, if im not mistaken ,since it's 120 files every 2 months. And people are already sending their files in for the next batch, so technically I would say the judges are a bit behind right now.. So my conclusion naturally regardless of whether I want my files in would be to lower the workload and lower the time between batches.

[Xiz]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

^ That's assuming there are enough judges, which there are not.

I agree the workload should be less on judges, but there are other factors to consider.

[DarkZtar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I have enough free time on my hands that I'd be willing to put forth the time and effort to judge if people saw me fit to. ~ (if the primary problem is still lacking judges)

[L.B.D.D]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

i will help judge venetian snares

[o____________o]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

"I stepped some files i could probably judge"


This still makes me laugh

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

In the midst of downloading files for the current batch for you guys, but:

ffffffffffff

[L.B.D.D]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

google detected that it Looks Like Another Batch Of Buzz Noise Crap

jk good luck downloading and taking care of batch bmah chang sir edmonton

[ItsOnlyDanO]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

fuck g-mail

[t-rogdor]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

"I stepped some files i could probably judge"


This still makes me laugh

proposing a new rule that if you've made a vertex beta restep any time AFTER ffr's year long shutdown you're a nerd and banned from judging

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

proposing a new rule that if you've made a vertex beta restep any time AFTER ffr's year long shutdown you're a nerd and banned from judging

oops