Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
What sort of qualifications does one need to be a judge and do I qualify
What sort of qualifications does one need to be a judge and do I qualify
-
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
write some reviews to prove that you can look at a file objectively and distance yourself from personal bias
don't really have that much time to elaborate, but i'll give you more information later if nobody repliesComment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
probably would need to talk to bmah about being a judge?
Originally posted by CharuComment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
yes but it still comes down to what i mentionedComment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
what is personal bias in relation to a file? whether it's your music type or whether you like the person who stepped the file? or whether you like burst more than stream etc?
but isn't that the reason we have multiple judges to have people who prefer different things give their 2 cents?Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Not sure if I'm understanding your second point, but...
Personally, we can say something like, "This part of the song is charted wrong." However, we can't just dismiss a simfile with a bad rating because the stepartist did not chart this part of the song the way you expected it to be charted. It's more on looking at the stepartist's intentions on why they charted this part of the song the way they did. Simfile judges follow certain rules for simfiling. It's a basis on what we can look at what is considered objective at a community standpoint such as pitch relevancy, layering choices, accenting, flow of patterns, etc.Last edited by AlexDest; 10-30-2013, 11:32 AM.
Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
can you guys just start judging in chunks of 10 every 2 days
because hard batch took a month anyways, so if you guys do 10 every 2 days, you could finish 120 in 24 days which is acceptableComment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
5 files a day doesn't seem that hard
if somebody's got time to shit they got time to judgeComment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Since there seems to be a shortage of judges why not ask some people who have made several good files to judge and see if they can do a good job instead of waiting for people to say they can judge?
It just seems like there would be a full team much faster that way.
Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
yeah, I understand i'ts kinda hard to judge though, cuz you have no idea what unique idea a stepcharter has with a certain part of the song. let's say there is a part where there is no significant sound to put steps to, but the sound of the keyboard can make a fun little rhythm while there is no sound. ofcourse it's not in sync, but it goes with the flow of the music.Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
the current state of charting for FFR is to prefer technically accurate charts to ones that have what you are referring to as "ghost" notes (steps). my perception is that players would would rather choose to play a song that makes them feel like they are following the music rather than playing something that is seemingly random.
entirely dependent on context. if it's really energetic music, it might. if it's more technical in nature, it won't. either way, i still dislike ghost notes and would rather see a carefully crafted chart than a 16th stream through the entire file that looks like somebody just threw a bunch of arrows at their monitor to see where they stick.
this isn't entirely true. a good judge can analyze a specific section in reference to other parts of the stepchart and devise a rational explanation as to why something was charted the way it is.Last edited by Fission; 10-30-2013, 03:14 PM.Comment
Comment