Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[VisD]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission email changed)

Sent in

Resub - Slam Crunk / Holiday Parade
Äventyr / Grand Thaw
Fading Star / ginkiha

Also submitting Äventyr for Halogen's tournament comp thing. :J

gogo 14 more files

[Xiz]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission email changed)

EDIT: Nvm im dumb

[ilikexd]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

sent t+pazolite - Electric Butterfly
so remove Gourmet na Aitsu from the batch since I have 3 in already : (

[VisD]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Made minor changes to Fading Star, and re-sent it.

Also sent in VALEDICT \o

[TheSaxRunner05]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission email changed)

Just start the batch already so that the file I sent 2 months ago gets judged within a year

Yea the last batch was sent early at 100 files, and I sent mine in for the tourny contest a couple of days after. There's no way they'll be judged before the official.

[DossarLX ODI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I have a problem with large batches like these because of the shortage of judges as well as the recent tardiness. It has come to the case where being late with notes is no longer "it sucks, but it can happen", but instead "it is expected".

A batch of 120 files, if there are 6 judges, will require 2 groups of 3 judges each having 60 files. If what happened in the hard songs batch (many marathon files) occurs this batch, notes could be absurdly late again. I even made a thread to track the progress of the judges, but it only got responses from myself and Choofers (who were both on time).

Instead, the batch should be judged each month. This way not only are there smaller batches, but stepartists can change their files up and submit to the next period if needed. The first submission for the current regular batch was in July, and it is now October. That's a 3 month difference, and in that time the files submitted in July could have received notes.

[L.B.D.D]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[DossarLX ODI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

These guys haven't judged in a while, but were on the team previously:

Gundam-Dude
megamon88
woker-X
leonid
Spitfire
gnr61
iironiic
Arch0wl
Patashu
qqwref

6 judges is going to be hard to manage with the current team.

[SKG_Scintill]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I can('t) judge depending on your outlook on me

[YoshL]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Instead, the batch should be judged each month. This way not only are there smaller batches, but stepartists can change their files up and submit to the next period if needed. The first submission for the current regular batch was in July, and it is now October. That's a 3 month difference, and in that time the files submitted in July could have received notes.

Thirdstyle tried, failed

I think something more like a bi-monthly thing, to coincide with the SAP maybe?

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

These guys haven't judged in a while, but were on the team previously:

Gundam-Dude
megamon88
woker-X
leonid
Spitfire
gnr61
iironiic
Arch0wl
Patashu
qqwref

6 judges is going to be hard to manage with the current team.

busy
idk
mexico
idk
busy
gone
idk
busy
idk

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

bi monthly would be the best option IMPO

[L.B.D.D]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

do random lottery

[Xiz]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Problem is there isn't an abundance of judges. I think once a month would be better, because granted, while judges might need to do notes more frequently, at-least there wouldn't be as many files for them to judge. This 'bi-monthly' test that has been going on for the past few months proves that the batch will not fill every month. (Which is good)

Keep SAP for every other month, but open batch and require judging every month. I'd guess that judges will be reviving 20-30 files after a few months of this method.

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

i dont think you know what the bi monthly thing is. that just relates to how many files can be submitted. it has nothing to do with judging.

what they are saying is that judges should actually just judge whatever files are in the batch every two months. i agree its better than just setting a high limit and waiting until its reached to judge because there is no reason to do that at all.