Time

[danthemano]

Re: Time

Oh I see...

so all energy forms have some sort of mass on a different dimension?

how do we know that there ARE other dimensions?
or does nobody have the time to explain to a simpleton like me?

[Xx{Midday}xX]

Re: Time

how do we know that there ARE other dimensions?
or does nobody have the time to explain to a simpleton like me?

Like this wasn't mentioned enough times by me already.

We can't "know" in the sense of perception. As Reach stated, it's imperceptable by human sensory organs. Hence, we are forced to rely on "knowing" in the sense of logic. These dimensions, including time, exist to benefit "our" interpretation of the universe. Without the dimension of time, all force equations would not work out. Hence, we believe the existence of time. Same with the other dimensions, though they would fill in holes in various other equations and knowledge.

[danthemano]

Re: Time

We can't "know" in the sense of perception. As Reach stated, it's imperceptable by human sensory organs.

even though our sensory organs cannot sense time, they can still feel the effects of time. eyes get worse as time goes on, and such.

saying we are forced to rely on logic because our human senses are not capable of detecting other dimensions works. but even though that bit of logic may fill in countless holes, whos to say that its right?

maybe our modern society is the first froup to solve the first part of the problem, and now we need to go back to the beginning and find if our answer is like a non-permissible-value in a highschool mathematics question. and if our solution turns out to be an npv? then all must start again from the very beginning.

[Xx{Midday}xX]

Re: Time

even though our sensory organs cannot sense time, they can still feel the effects of time. eyes get worse as time goes on, and such.

saying we are forced to rely on logic because our human senses are not capable of detecting other dimensions works. but even though that bit of logic may fill in countless holes, whos to say that its right?

maybe our modern society is the first froup to solve the first part of the problem, and now we need to go back to the beginning and find if our answer is like a non-permissible-value in a highschool mathematics question. and if our solution turns out to be an npv? then all must start again from the very beginning.

We, as a group of humans, must progress. We can only progress by choosing something arbitrary. It's not like there are infinite possibilities out there. This one makes sense. So we stick with it. If it's wrong, then yes, we just redo the process. That is science, and the basics of experimentation.