what's the answer to this? my friend and i got different answers
-
Last edited by ilikexd; 02-12-2016, 05:43 PM. -
Re: fruit math
a bit of a crude trick, huh?
iono if you really want me to elaborate on it or see other peoples reactions first. I'll wait.Last edited by Frank Munoz; 02-12-2016, 03:15 AM.
-
Re: fruit math
9 or 14, leaning towards 9 because lol mathLast edited by Mourningfall; 02-12-2016, 04:14 AM.Comment
-
Re: fruit math
moot frathComment
-
Re: fruit math
17
How to stepmaniaComment
-
Re: fruit math
saw 17, then I looked very closely at the last set of fruit and now
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
edit: ok nathan I see you editing the OP day by day nice tryLast edited by GammaBlaster; 02-13-2016, 06:50 PM.Comment
-
Re: fruit math
This problem is a modified version of this one I believe.
I think someone just grabbed some stock photos to make this, and badly erased part of the hand of bananas in the last equation to mess with people.
-the coconuts are also skewed in the second equation-
Then other manipulations came in, eventually coming to what we have here.
1.
From what I've seen, this is the 'go-to' method to solve the other version.
-maybe not the exact process, but the outcome is what the majority gets-
makes some sense, right?
each banana on the hand counts as 1, and one side of the split coconut equals 1.
Though we cannot really prove that the split coconut is cut directly in half, it is heavily implied that it is. Which, imo isn't enough info, but for the generalization of a numerical answer it is understandable.
2.
For the problem provided in this thread though, the possible outcomes become more ambiguous due to the apple without-a-leaf in the last equation.
If we are to take what we learned from the other version,
the equation would be something like this
Though we did generalize one side of the split coconut to equal 1, and one banana to also equal 1, we can not do the same for the apple with no leaf as it is too obscure.
What we can assume is that the no leaf apple is probably less than the leafed one... probably.
3.
In reality, the last equation uses images that are similar but are not exact to the ones used in the first three.
Meaning there is not enough information to solve for "??", or any of the three images provided to solve for "??".
Like... the images are close,
kinda like how 9 is pretty close to 10.
or how a black-flag on Max forever is pretty close to an AAA.
and how close these images are to each other can only be determined by speculation.
Which just isn't good enough to give a precise answer.
But we can almost safely say that the three images in the last equation equal something less than those above them.
final answer
or, anything ranging from -infinity to infinity
as there is no real indication of the images being.. anything really.
edit: OP changed the picture so this will most likely confuse yall nowLast edited by Frank Munoz; 02-12-2016, 08:17 PM.Comment
-
Re: fruit math
The way it's designed I think the answer is 15.Comment
-
Re: fruit math
that apple without a leaf looks very symmetrical
even I can mirror an apple with paint
so badLast edited by SKG_Scintill; 02-12-2016, 07:39 AM.
Originally posted by bluguerillaComment
-
-
Re: fruit math
pineapple
Comment
-
Re: fruit math
14.5Comment
-
Re: fruit math
15-L where L is an indeterminate value of leaf that can range from 0-10.Comment
-
Re: fruit math
however if we give the leaf a negative value, does it even exist? thats like saying it has negative mass, and since the value is representing a piece of mass it should be positive.
perhaps this problem is past us, maybe we need to send it to the theoretical physics team, they've had a pretty good discovery recently maybe they'll discover the answer to this too.Comment
Comment