Ban debate

[Coolboyrulez0]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions OPEN!)

That sounds more reasonable. In what way do you think that Anaru is trying to constantly "break the rules" or shows bad behavior?
He, just like you, has an opinion about things and is vocal about things because he cares about this site... same reason he makes files, obviously.
While he may word something harshly, or even be the dissenting opinion, doesn't mean he's not entitled to that opinion.
Also, besides that I have not seen any behavior that indicates that he is destructive to the community as opposed to being a beneficial, contributing member.
And yes, I would concur that someone who would constantly post porn or flame users without merit has no place here. This is not the case with Anaru though.

That's all here from me.

[Zakvvv666]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions OPEN!)

I agree with Krunky, Anaru has shown that he doesn't deserve to be a part of the community. Cheating on more than one account, and he also insults several members of the site with no reason. He clearly doesn't care much about this game or the community.

[krunkykai22]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions OPEN!)

Listen, I have absolutely nothing against Anaru, period. I actually like the dude.

My post had absolutely NOTHING to do with him, even though, it may have sounded like it. I can say I was absolutely shocked as hell to find out he was blacklisted.

I was merely giving prime examples, of things. I never once said a person's name. Anaru has been here for years, so they know what's best for the site.

All I was trying to say is that someone who is permanently banned for how ever long should not have any privileges DURING the time they are banned, period.

I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. Was not my intention.

EDIT: Regardless of how I feel about Anaru, I have to agree with Zak, I mean if you TRULY want to prove yourself that you WANT to be here after being blacklisted and kept ban evading, you truly have gotten so many chances. There HAS to be a time when an admin says enough is enough regardless of anything.

[blindreper1179]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submissions OPEN!)

Have you seen half of his posts? They're all rude, and/or trolling. I don't see how that's beneficial at all....

[Razor]

Re: Ban debate

lol this thread

[Winrar]

Re: Ban debate

ITT: people butthurt over others on the internet. Calm down.

[Zakvvv666]

Re: Ban debate

I would also like to note that when Kommi got banned, he didn't spend his time ban evading/insulting other users, iirc he even took the time to write a letter of apology which got his ban shortened, now he's back and contributing to the site.

[Coolboyrulez0]

Re: Ban debate

ITT: people butthurt over others on the internet. Calm down.

CBR singing out.

[0]

Re: Ban debate

[krunkykai22]

Re: Ban debate

Kommisar was the prime example in my previous post. I didn't use him name but he did it the RIGHT way, and now look at him. As I said, provided even more then before.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Ban debate

I get a feeling that Anaru would be considerably less docile if his accounts were given back to him.

Then again, I'm really not sure and I won't speculate. Either way, Anaru never really seemed like a bad person to me. I've seen people act way worse on the forums and not be disciplined for considerably longer stretches -- while this doesn't make things right, it does make me wonder why people get so irritated with Anaru as quickly as they do in comparison to someone else.

eh, whatever. it's not really that important to me anyway, lol

[Xx{Midnight}xX]

Re: Ban debate

Kommisar was the prime example in my previous post. I didn't use him name but he did it the RIGHT way, and now look at him. As I said, provided even more then before.

Kommi is a weird case to be honest. He's a chill guy and he simply just posted badly. Glad he's not doing that anymore.

It literally should be only in the case of permas / ips or more than a one year ban ect. We're in different times now than we where.

Also

Anyone who argues about the potential of the person as a stepper or judge ect

realize that your potential is actually completely irrelevant. You can be replaced.

Quite easily I may add.

Now, someone might argue that we're only talking about this because it's Anaru. And honestly, this should have been a rule since the beginning. He's just kind of the person making this come to light in the event of any future people.

[Reincarnate]

Re: Ban debate

i have too many chips for my dip

but if i open a new dip

i'd have too much dip for my chips

[Winrar]

Re: Ban debate

Listen, this site isn't encyclopedia Britannica or anything serious. It's just an arrow smashing site with people that can't take criticism and get sad if everyone isn't their friend
So what if someone doesn't post to YOUR expectations, this is going to continue to be a low pop site filled with individuals that have a blast out of getting reactions out of others that are "new" to the "internet".

[krunkykai22]

Re: Ban debate

Believe it or not Middie said the golden thing:

He's just kind of the person making this come to light in the event of any future people.


That's exactly what it is. Not necessarily PINNING Anaru for this whole debate, but his case is the prime example of what SHOULD NOT happen and the case where he shouldn't have ANY privileges for the constant evasion. I'm sorry, but it's true in the sheer fact that this should have been a rule a LONG time ago...