Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

increasing judge's load by a lot = no

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Does it surprise you that someone whose position is that simfiles cannot be objectively evaluated would not have an objective method of judging? It is objective with respect to my charting style, but that's as far as anyone can go. A method is not objective just because it is systematic.

I guess I can say it does surprise me a little bit. Truthfully, there's nothing really erroneous about the chart rhythm wise, but the overall structure is a bit off.

I would have +'d cheeseburger if I was judging it. idg why you hate it. I guess the <3 of exotic swing is lost when you transfer it into ffr though

It really is lost...you can AAA the entire song just using the 96th swing as 16th runs; kinda sad really.

Backstory: The chart was actually rushed for a tournament that happened on FFR, as was Strikebeam, AND The Crow's Newspaper (although TCN was the first chart I worked on; as a result, it came out the best out of the three). I created the final rounds for every division and put them on the DF engine, and then pulled them off once the tournament was over. I don't hate my chart, it's just not properly structured -- more freeform than anything. But hey, it's cool to see that you liked it

[kommisar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

maybe people should just deal with judgments and fix their files


the judges haven't been selected to spite your files; they know how to make good files and will tell you how to do it.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

So far, that's what the consensus seems to be. The answer is a no, then. Keep making suggestions though.

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

are we sending batch notes to the email again or to bmah?

[kommisar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I've always sent them to bmah ._.

[ichliebekase]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Yea, the judges don't get picked to spite files, they just get picked in some random order as it seems.

Maybe the teams should be consistent? Unless this created a problem in the past that I don't know about.

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

keeping people on their toes. what judge you gunna get this batch?! who knos

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

i stepped virt(oh shit) and more ronald jenkees(oh shit) along with nero went to legoland(oh shit)

next batch is going to be a big heavy hitter batch for me(all files unreleased too!!)

[woker-X]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

too bad that the normal batch will be closed some time

[cedolad]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

too bad that the normal batch will be closed some time

Gives me time to finish my files.

[god]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

excluding "Sun and Stars". so this means my song didn't make it? o.0

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

The exclusions are in place when a range of files includes a judge's file.

Say you were a judge and you submitted file F, and you have to judge A-I, file F would be excluded from the entire group because you're in that group of judging.

[Duplica]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

excluding "Sun and Stars". so this means my song didn't make it? o.0

yeah just by looking at the song title they deemed it unworthy of even being sent to the judges. sorry XD



oh by the way how do I ask for permissions? Are there steps to follow? I want to ask a few artists.

[justin_ator]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

god created the Sun and Stars file/song

How amusing


Edit: There isn't necessarily specific steps, but there is a thread that is linked to in the Artist Blanket Permission v5 thread that contains some templates you could use. Just be courteous, and make sure your question is clear. If they are signed to labels, you have to get permission from the record label as well (or instead?).