Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[woker-X]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

he's being sarcastic (I hope so)

[megamon88]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Super ninjad

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Wow.

My post about the color notes was complete sarcasm. I use color notes for emphasis in like all my charts lmao



and another thing. I mentioned from this point on I was going to be a butthurt furry and make my ratings STRICT. I judged completely legitimate. Silvuh relax you got the good side of things. Your files annoy the shit out of me because you pick some repetitive and annoying slow piano songs, but your technical-manias wins over enough judgments. I have this to say

HOLY SHIT PEOPLE LEARN HOW TO USE PITCH RELEVANCY.

Thank you for playing.

To answer other things, yes I mean < or > whatever meaning the other file is better. You get what I mean.

Bmah, "From "Passage D"(by 2 submitters) to "Youshou 02" and "An Unwanted Magician and a Cheery Rebel", "Dance and Zeal", "Fatum Anima", "I Remember When", excluding "Sun and Stars".

[Resubmissions - 5]
From "A Battle for the Sky" to "Fast Asleep"."
I'm pretty sure this is what I judged.

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

PS

... Why are you a judge, again?

I believe what you just stated there contradicts the whole privilege you have been given. I might be 90% stupid, but the 10% that's left knows that some sounds can only be synced with 12nd, 64th or even 96th, for that matter, even if the stepper narrowed the BPM perfectly. Because, you know... Song artists can place sounds where the hell they want without caring about BPM.

Also, I thought that sync was more important than the notes' colors. Color-blindness happens. You can't just give a file a score of 3 out of 5 because of something like: "While the file was fun and the song choice interesting, you used weird colors for your arrows. Therefore, you're a horrible stepper."

This isn't strict, it is simply unfair!

I so wanted to put this in my signature, but I got cockblocked by length. Screw you conformity!

[cedolad]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

itt: we discuss sarcasm.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

and another thing. I mentioned from this point on I was going to be a butthurt furry and make my ratings STRICT. I judged completely legitimate. Silvuh relax you got the good side of things. Your files annoy the shit out of me because you pick some repetitive and annoying slow piano songs, but your technical-manias wins over enough judgments. I have this to say

HOLY SHIT PEOPLE LEARN HOW TO USE PITCH RELEVANCY.

@ PR note: coming from the person who believes that descending scales should only be stepped as 432143214321432143214321432143214321, lol

also, judging unnecessarily strict in comparison to your normal judging style is retarded.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Bmah, "From "Passage D"(by 2 submitters) to "Youshou 02" and "An Unwanted Magician and a Cheery Rebel", "Dance and Zeal", "Fatum Anima", "I Remember When", excluding "Sun and Stars".

[Resubmissions - 5]
From "A Battle for the Sky" to "Fast Asleep"."
I'm pretty sure this is what I judged plus one more.

heh fixed

don't worry, I just removed whatever was irrelevant

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

@ PR note: coming from the person who believes that descending scales should only be stepped as 432143214321432143214321432143214321, lol

also, judging unnecessarily strict in comparison to your normal judging style is retarded.

ask people about my stepmania judging. Finding a file I like is damn near impossible. I toned it down for FFR judgings because I'm used to people letting completely shit files in the game. I decided it was time to be the judge I really am inside.

DON'T JUDGE ME FOR BEING MYSELF MOM.

[aperson]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

@ PR note: coming from the person who believes that descending scales should only be stepped as 432143214321432143214321432143214321, lol

Depends on what the intervals are.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

finding a file you like =/= finding a good file, because even good files can go past you since you're having a bias towards things that appeal to you

EDIT:

Depends on what the intervals are.

If a melody is repeating the same 4 notes for a short time, fine -- if it's a descending scale that just keeps going down, 4321 over and over again is boring and isn't the best way to represent the music. Heck, even 4321423143214231 gives more of a feel than just a repeating pattern for a not repeating scale.

[MarioNintendo]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

PS



I so wanted to put this in my signature, but I got cockblocked by length. Screw you conformity!

Aw come on, now, don't get all harsh on my case. :P I just had an awful day, and to believe that one judge up there was corrupted or something just kind of tipped the bowl over. I'm glad it was sarcasm, though. Despite the fact that everybody now just learned I'm a noob at reading between the lines.

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

finding a file you like =/= finding a good file, because even good files can go past you since you're having a bias towards things that appeal to you

its not really I bias. I hate all files pretty much. The only thing that makes me moderately like them is if they are technically correct. It makes you feel like you're actually playing the song, not smashing your hands against the keyboard in a completely random fashion.
Also I am training internet people to play the piano like a real socially awkward person.


To quote the great carlos,
[font size=authoritative]THERE WILL BE NO VARIATION IN FILES AS LONG AS IM HERE.[/size]

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

It is. It means I will never have my judgments swayed towards a particular song/file/artist. All files are equal until judged. It's actually the optimal viewpoint to have, imo

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

In any case, I fail to see how having no bias towards a file is a bad thing. If I had bias, I would reject files from everyone I don't like, and accept them from people I do like. Should I be doing that for the next batch?
Didn't think so.

PS that sharpnel file I did have many legit reasons for.

[qqwref]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

When these batch notes are over I'm going to grade all the judges It will be completely objective (based on batch notes/grades only) and I'm keeping my criteria secret so nobody fixes up their notes just for this. Should be fun