Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

To be honest, you guys wouldn't be saying that if it happened to you where you got extreme scores on files without proper justification :/

stop assuming things.

connect was rejected TWICE because the judges thought it was boring

when i stepped infernoplex my file wasnt even looked at because"hi19's version is already queued and you probably couldnt do better than him"

when i submitted forsaken neon rebirths review was"my file is better rejected"

yes i do know how it feels and you want to know why you didnt know about it? because i didnt throw a bitch fit like every other god damn person that got dick slapped by the system

[cedolad]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Just work hard and get your files better. Everyone goes through the amateur phase. Just get better and keep working until your files are actually worth something. Be your own critic before you let others critique it.

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

heres a suggestion for a system rehaul

throw out 1-5 and go with letter grades and a 1-10 system

just like grading the final grade would be based on the average of all 4 scores

9-10=A
7-8=B
5-6=C
3-4=D
1-2=F

A=accept
B=light accept
C=conditional accept
D=needs major fixes
F=reject

[iironiic]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

heres a suggestion for a system rehaul

throw out 1-5 and go with letter grades and a 1-10 system

just like grading the final grade would be based on the average of all 4 scores

9-10=A
7-8=B
5-6=C
3-4=D
1-2=F

A=accept
B=light accept
C=conditional accept
D=needs major fixes
F=reject

I approve.

[qqwref]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

heres a suggestion for a system rehaul

throw out 1-5 and go with letter grades and a 1-10 system

just like grading the final grade would be based on the average of all 4 scores

9-10=A
7-8=B
5-6=C
3-4=D
1-2=F

A=accept
B=light accept
C=conditional accept
D=needs major fixes
F=reject

This would be fine, as long as a file doesn't require something dumb like 9.25 average to get in.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I think the system overhaul is just unnecessary. The grading scale is fine, it's the judging split-up that might be a problem.

[Wineandbread]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I think it's completely pointless to have some random symbol system with +s and +?s and +.s when it's perfectly reasonable to just use numbers

Also if you increase the scale the gray borderline file area will increase significantly imo

On another note I love reading drama

K back to lurkin'

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Also if you increase the scale the gray borderline file area will increase significantly imo

not with the letter grades

This would be fine, as long as a file doesn't require something dumb like 9.25 average to get in.

you'd need an A-B for an accept so it wouldnt be based on the numbers

example of my system:

a file i submitted got 2-7-7-10

add the numbers(26) and then average it(6.5)

6.5 would be a C which would be a conditional. the 2 wouldnt totally ruin the chances of a file being accepted anymore

[Mans0n]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

and now it's just the waiting game Can't wait to see my song in the game. Being an up and coming R1 music producer lol

[BeatofIke]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Even if the current judging system gets changed, you guys will complain about it anyway if your files get rejected

That's probably true.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

JX/bmah -- if you're relying on votes for files that are borderline, you probably won't be receiving them from Kayla.

[NocturneAunamic]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

That's probably true.

Not if the results aren't so weird again. Having one super low grade from a judge while you have other consistent 4s/5s shouldn't **** up your chances.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

People are getting a little too upset about the ratings. If a judge has a ton to say about your file and they gave you a low rating when the other judges gave you high ones, you probably should be getting upset at the higher ratings for not noticing mistakes and effectively getting your hopes up.

Those with consistent ratings throughout all judges obviously have fixes that need to be made.

If there's an issue with the judge opinion that results in a sudden drop in scores, and doesn't seem legitimate, present a case in the thread so that one of the head judges can see it. I really don't understand what the huge issue is.

[leonid]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

The only issue is that their files got rejected

[leonid]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Not if the results aren't so weird again. Having one super low grade from a judge while you have other consistent 4s/5s shouldn't **** up your chances.

That's the point of having several judges. It's not that that one judge killed your chances. It's rather those other judges saved your simfile from being abysmal to being kinda feasible with some fixes.