-
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Not just jx, but bmah as well. Especially if one of them was a judge in the first place of the file [example: someone in group 2 this batch wants a "jx" grading but he already was a judge for that group, it'd go to bmah instead to keep it fair.]Glorious Morning - Misc, level 48
We Will Fly - Dance 2, level 53
=.The Ocean.= - Dance 2, level 56, collab with krunkykai22
Garden Party - Dance, level 38Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
And in that case you put the file under a "controversial" review. You take the file and send it to JX and bmah and take the mean of there ratings.
IE;
TC_Halogen = 5
qqwref = 5
i love you = 1
samurai = 1
Goes to JX and bmah
JX = 5
bmah = 3
Score = 4
Or any other two judges that would fit the profile so to say.
Not if the passing grade is a 4.
Which is what it should be. 3.7 to be exact.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Using an averaging system with a huge spread of ratings (5/5/5/1, 5/5/4/1, 5/5/1/2, w/e), you can have JX/bmah come in to add a 5th and 6th rating to help level (or lower if rightfully deserved).
That might help with files that have wild ranges.Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Yeah a 5-3-3-2 file isn't passing. Put it to the calculator it equals out at = 3.6666 whatever.
Under the 3.7 passing grade it does not pass.
3-5-4 would pass with an average 4.
4-4-4 Would pass obviously with an average 4.
It would make things easier to use 3.7/3.8 which would be borderline really good files.
EDIT: yeah I know it would pass. But 3 is an average grade. Meaning it would pass if you look at school grades. C is average to be honest, and you pass with that.
A 5
B 4
C 3
D 2
F 1
There.Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
So getting straight B's in this judging system is considered a conditional?!
Man, getting an FFR education ain't no joke.
@ Bmah, am i allow to post my notes here?===============================
The idea that RDCP 3 may come out in the future is a fun thought to have~
===============================Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
With the whole average stuff, all of the notes written would have to be put into consideration no matter what. If a file gets 5 3 3 2 and the person who gave the 2 has fully legitimate reasons as to why they gave that rating and ways to fix it, then obviously it'd have to truly be considered. It's all conditional.Glorious Morning - Misc, level 48
We Will Fly - Dance 2, level 53
=.The Ocean.= - Dance 2, level 56, collab with krunkykai22
Garden Party - Dance, level 38Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Ight, I'll look into it some more. Was kinda thinking it was the middle part at first since that was one of the parts I was iffy about, but I'll relook through it and mess around with it a bit to see what comes out. Piano songs are tricky so im still learning about the whole correct PR to use and such for them. lol.YES, I AM SUFFERING TO THE MIDDLE SECTION OF THE SONG, THANKS FOR ASKING
Assuming suffering means referring in your language, no, I'm not talking about the middle.
I'm actually referring to the introduction, where you have repeated descending scales, and the first note is accented with a jump. It's just a descending 4-3-2-1-4-3-2-1 (etc.) scale that repeats over and over again. When the strings come in, you could have an actual excuse to use jumps if you so chose to.
A lot of the pitch relevancy in the song is generally incorrect in terms of following the piano, and while I understand the accenting of jumps for heavier sounds or a louder piano, you should still try to improve upon the general pitch because the song itself is relatively short.Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
You know, Byron that is the best post I've seen in a long time.
If you look at the way judging and reviews have gone in the past 3 or 4 batches, you'll see just how strict the majority of people have gotten.
The file would have to be amazing to pass to be honest.
This system with a 3.8 makes the files Great. Not AMAZING because to be honest, some files may be great to some and shitty to another. RATO/DP/grind2/RAN for example. Those files to some are the shittiest things ever. But to the judges it passed.
And, in my opinion, not all songs have to be FANTASTIC OR AMAZING to 3/4 judges for the file to pass. It can be acceptable.Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Hey man, it comes with a lot of practice. Here's a general idea for you to follow for songs that have a running melody (and therefore will be your main source of layering) -- try to make running melodies PR'd, and then any accents that play along side of them that you choose, to be free-form. This way, you can accurately represent your running melody with good pitch, and then accurately account for accents by increases in layering when they're due.
Also, not really going to go about how to deal with the rating system; it might upset some people. All I will say is, 16 should be a borderline, but only 4/4/4/4 should pass without an appeal of any sort (4 +.'s equals consistency).Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
jesus christ stop your bitching
dossar stop with your butthurt bullshit
everyone else stop with your butthurt bullshit
DEAL WITH IT BITCHES IF YOU DONT LIKE IT SUBMIT YOUR SHIT TO ANOTHER SITE/PACK OR RELEASE AS A SINGLE
Comment
-
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Get over your files being rejected and seek insightful ways to make your files better rather than make up excuses and try to work around the system :/
Comment
Flash Flash Revolution
Comment