Re: Marriage
He is arguing that the ceremoniousness and formalities of the marriage process is objectively ornamental and only done to further embellish and recognize the subjective significance it holds to the individual. The subjective significance is whether the individual deems it as important or not. Arch0wl's opinion is elucidating the views of a lesser importance by comparison to other events with the same intricacies.
Somehow, there is tacit agreement that without official and legal assent and recognition, marriage is unjust. With legal recognition, it becomes an event with intrinsic importance.
He is arguing that the ceremoniousness and formalities of the marriage process is objectively ornamental and only done to further embellish and recognize the subjective significance it holds to the individual. The subjective significance is whether the individual deems it as important or not. Arch0wl's opinion is elucidating the views of a lesser importance by comparison to other events with the same intricacies.
Somehow, there is tacit agreement that without official and legal assent and recognition, marriage is unjust. With legal recognition, it becomes an event with intrinsic importance.
Comment