I disagree with this proposal. I feel that if people want to play the game, it should be like TWG almost, with a set signup period. People should not be allowed to join the game halfway through.
213. If the rules are changed so that further play is impossible, or if the legality of a move cannot be determined with finality, or if by the Judge's best reasoning, not overruled, a move appears equally legal and illegal, then the first player unable to complete a turn is the winner.
maybe the repeal of this rule? We can add a rule next round saying that if further play is impossible, the rules are changed so further play is possible.
that could be really troublesome with the whole the whole "the rules will be changed" part I suggest we modify that to "the inhibiting rule will be repealed."
Okay, I guess it could be changed by that. What do you think of that? Also, the latest rule that opposes it is the one that gets repealed, not the first one.
Comment