I'm voting nay, noting that while I will try, I may have trouble voting on time for everything. If more than half of the people are away, we can't pass anything. While I admit that democratic government doesn't function properly if more than half the people are away, this is a forum and not everyone will be as involved as necessary. Also, this is CT, what ever happened to not just agreeing/disagreeing? What's the use in lowering the winning point value to 100 if everyone's changes are passed? Let's get some discussion going on, the way it's meant to be played.
Well, reading the rest of the thread, there was no indication that there was any more requirement to join beyond posting a vote. Hence, I voted nay to enter myself as a voter/player. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Sorry, I was at camp and just got back, but yes I agree and here is my proposal.
304. For someone to join in the game, they post in this thread, clearly indicating they would like to join. Then a vote is passed to admit them into the game. 3/4 Majority is required to admit them into the game. They are then added to the list and play the same as the original players.
Comment