IQ

[ieatyourlvllol]

Re: IQ

Yeah, as far as I can tell, your reasoning for 51 is sound. It makes a lot more sense now. I'm still surprised they decided to throw in such a curveball after all the sequentially structured problems that preceded it.

P.S. - lol you got the hardest problem on the test but flubbed on easy junk gg

P.P.S. - the rotating grids w/ shapes are pretty much ~time vortices~

[Scrab]

Re: IQ

102 on Reach's Test he posted on the 1st/2nd page.

I skipped a couple of questions because I was a bit busy and didn't really have time to, and in other tests I'd gotten 130/126 etc..

[devonin]

Re: IQ

But it's ok - Devonin got the good end of the stick.

As I recall, the last time I received a professionally administered IQ test, the results were somewhere along the lines of "His intelligence is highly above average, but the lateral thinking componant was a lot more 'average'" with the basic conclusion that I'm quite intelligent, understand things easily, have excellent memory and recall, but once you ask me to get all abstract, I have difficulties more in line with the average.

So I'm really good at Sudoku and really bad at Rubix Cubes.

[Nyokou]

Re: IQ

Haha, we must be the same then devonin. I actually did my first Sudoku puzzle a couple of weeks ago and got extremely addicted to them... and apparently I'm really good at them. But I have such a difficult time with Rubik's Cubes. God, I can't do them at all... but then again, I have never owned one so I haven't really taken the time to actually solve it, but the few times I have tried has frustrated me.

[MrRubix]

Re: IQ

The cube is MUCH easier to understand if you think of it as three layers instead of 6 sides. There are 8 corner pieces and 12 edge pieces and 6 centers. The centers always stay the same relative to each other (e.g. red always opposite orange, etc).

Once you think of the cube in terms of layers, edges, and corners, it's a lot simpler to understand and visualize.

No speedcuber solves a cube "by sides." It's all about putting the right corners/edges into each layer.

[Scrab]

Re: IQ

Yeah, and once your name is after an actual Rubix cube, THEN, you can only be one of the elite.

[Mulie]

Re: IQ

Bringing it back to life!
My IQ was 138 in a non-timed online test, 134 is a timed one, and 134 again in a reputable one.

Said reputable test: http://www.highiqsociety.org/iq_tests/

[Reach]

Re: IQ

For those that are interested:

http://www.cerebrals.com/tests/cpic/CEREBRALS%20SOCIETY%20INTERNATIONAL%20CONTEST.pdf

I breezed through the verbal items in a few minutes. I found them simple, though I am unsure of one of the answers.

The number sequences are more difficult. I can't seem to solve a number of them...actually, some of them are highly difficult. I haven't spent much time trying to solve them yet though.

[ii GuRu]

Re: IQ

132 I took the test last year.

[Ice wolf]

Re: IQ

I'm taking it right now but I skipped most of the first section because I was drawing blanks. I am usually good at finding patterns, though.

EDIT: Wow, I must be doing really bad. Every time I think one is hard, the one after it is really easy.

EDIT2: Maybe not... In the word section they had gn____ and ch____ mixed in with some easy ones.

[Reach]

Re: IQ

I'm taking it right now but I skipped most of the first section because I was drawing blanks. I am usually good at finding patterns, though.

EDIT: Wow, I must be doing really bad. Every time I think one is hard, the one after it is really easy.

EDIT2: Maybe not... In the word section they had gnosticism and chrysocracy mixed in with some easy ones.

It says in the introduction that the items are arranged randomly and are not in order of difficulty.

Same goes for the number sequences.


Edit: Also, if you're interested in extremely difficult tests, you could try: http://webs.ono.com/asit/

Apparently Mensa Sweden is using this as a test for a summer competition as well. I won't be submitting answers for this one, though it can be fun if you're bored anyway. I managed to solve 18 of them in an hour or so.

[Mulie]

Re: IQ

For those that are interested:

http://www.cerebrals.com/tests/cpic/CEREBRALS%20SOCIETY%20INTERNATIONAL%20CONTEST.pdf

I breezed through the verbal items in a few minutes. I found them simple, though I am unsure of one of the answers.

The number sequences are more difficult. I can't seem to solve a number of them...actually, some of them are highly difficult. I haven't spent much time trying to solve them yet though.

I'm interested. =)

I see what you mean about the number section. Here are the first five I couldn't solve in fiveish minutes each:

8. 12345, 423, -12, ( ?)
9. 12, 1314, 13271329, ( ?)
12. 77, 16.5, 1414, 33, 88888, ( ?), ( ?)
14. 311165, 21143, 1121, 0, 2112, 43112, ( ?), ( ?)
15. 12345, 12345, 21354, 52341, 12345, 54321, ( ?), ( ?)

I think I could solve 9, 14 and 15 with more time.

The vocab part is trivial; you fill out what you know and can't help the others. Writers, or people with experience in literature, have a big advantage.

edit:

EDIT2: Maybe not... In the word section they had gn___ and ch___ mixed in with some easy ones.

Those are two questions I couldn't answer. Gn___ was foggy in my mind - I've seen the word maybe three times in my life - and Ch___ is a word I've never heard.

[Reach]

Re: IQ

The vocab part is trivial; you fill out what you know and can't help the others. Writers, or people with experience in literature, have a big advantage.


Those are two questions I couldn't answer. Gnosticism was foggy in my mind - I've seen the word maybe three times in my life - and Chrysocracy is a word I've never heard.

Well, it isn't trivial. This test is fairly well designed actually. Measures of vocabulary are, contrary to what you might think at first, generally good measures of IQ. That is because more intelligent people have larger vocabularies and working memories, so well designed vocabulary tests can tap into these differences. Some problems with administering this type of test over the internet is persistent people could try to cheat, but overall vocabulary is a relatively good measure of IQ.

And yes, those are some of the hardest questions on the test, though, he probably shouldn't have posted the answers.

If some people want to team up in an attempt to break this test, by all means, go ahead (Though, it probably won't work, as it will rely heavily on the most intelligent person in the group, as less intelligent people will have more trouble verifying answers), but keep the answers out of this thread please!


But yeah, those 5 number sequences are very hard. I worked on this section for about an hour and answered 34 of them, 31 of them with confidence. There are about 10 or so that are incredibly difficult IMO.

[Mulie]

Re: IQ

I agree with you, Reach.

Did you solve any of the sequences I posted?

[Reach]

Re: IQ

I agree with you, Reach.

Did you solve any of the sequences I posted?

Two of them, but one of them was one of answers I am not confident in - it was an inkling, but it could be wrong. These are 5 of the harder problems on the test.

12 is baffling. I also can't get anywhere with 15 or 8. If you figure out any of these I would be interested in knowing via PM.