Regardless of what the so-called experts refer to as art or poetry, one cannot really have a strict definition of neither.
Poetry is a skill. Not everyone can be a poet; this is why I admire people who are capable of tailoring sonnets, epic poetry, and such. However, not all 'sub-divisions' of poetry are at the same level. In fact, some are a lot easier to do than others. As I mentioned before, poetry is a skill that only few can perform, thus giving everyone the chance to be masters of a skill makes the skill lose its specialness. For this case, I will set my eyes on Free Verse.
Free verse (also at times referred to as vers libre) is a term describing various styles of poetry that are not written using strict meter or rhyme, but that still are recognizable as 'poetry' by virtue of complex patterns of one sort or another that readers will perceive to be part of a coherent whole.
You see, Free Verse can have any shape or form. Any meter, any rhyme scheme, or no scheme at all. There is no pattern to it. It is quite obvious that one of the greatest difficulties that apply when tailoring poetry is finding the right words to express your thoughts in a certain pattern. Simply put, it's patterned expression. Stripping poetry of its pattern is stripping poetry from its genuineness.
Anyone can do Free Verse. Anyone can say anything they've written has meaning; the fact of the matter is, most of what we write doesn't always have a meaning. But for argument's sake, lets suppose it does. You write something in some random pattern, and poof! instant poetry.
I don't think so.
One cannot, and should not, compare Free Verse to Shakespeare, Wordsworth, Milton, Dante, Pope, etc.
If anyone can do it, it's not really worth it. When poetry is stripped of its form, then it becomes easy. This isn't fair for those skilled in this art.
I prompt you to prove to me that Free Verse is actually worthy of being classified as poetry.
Poetry is a skill. Not everyone can be a poet; this is why I admire people who are capable of tailoring sonnets, epic poetry, and such. However, not all 'sub-divisions' of poetry are at the same level. In fact, some are a lot easier to do than others. As I mentioned before, poetry is a skill that only few can perform, thus giving everyone the chance to be masters of a skill makes the skill lose its specialness. For this case, I will set my eyes on Free Verse.
Free verse (also at times referred to as vers libre) is a term describing various styles of poetry that are not written using strict meter or rhyme, but that still are recognizable as 'poetry' by virtue of complex patterns of one sort or another that readers will perceive to be part of a coherent whole.
You see, Free Verse can have any shape or form. Any meter, any rhyme scheme, or no scheme at all. There is no pattern to it. It is quite obvious that one of the greatest difficulties that apply when tailoring poetry is finding the right words to express your thoughts in a certain pattern. Simply put, it's patterned expression. Stripping poetry of its pattern is stripping poetry from its genuineness.
Anyone can do Free Verse. Anyone can say anything they've written has meaning; the fact of the matter is, most of what we write doesn't always have a meaning. But for argument's sake, lets suppose it does. You write something in some random pattern, and poof! instant poetry.
I don't think so.
One cannot, and should not, compare Free Verse to Shakespeare, Wordsworth, Milton, Dante, Pope, etc.
If anyone can do it, it's not really worth it. When poetry is stripped of its form, then it becomes easy. This isn't fair for those skilled in this art.
I prompt you to prove to me that Free Verse is actually worthy of being classified as poetry.

Comment