Starman requirement thread.

[Jtehanonymous]

Hope this hasn't already been created.

What do you guys think about it, pretty nuts huh? XD

edit: whoo! got it. I think third?





Very very....evil. Rofl.

[Fantasticone]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

Since I quit FFR as of now due to it, idk.

[nintendorules]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

its a load of FILL IN THE BLANK that you have to get THAT many goods

edit: your first nonhacker with PROOF of getting

[Jtehanonymous]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

its a load of FILL IN THE BLANK that you have to get THAT many goods

That's what I thought. That's what I still think.

There need to be cooler requirements. =/

[ChaosMaster1]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

indeed. but its called SKILL TOKEN for a reason hate it of love it.

[DarkManticoreX2]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

the fc part is crap

either 160 goods or 150 with a fc, but not both

[Jtehanonymous]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

indeed. but its called SKILL TOKEN for a reason hate it of love it.

Skill in what, unskilled timing?

Doesn't seem like the main purpose of what a skill token should really require.

It wouldn't be bad if there were a few of these types of tokens...but there's been a lot of these sort lately.

[nintendorules]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

vermuck you do not count.

[.dot]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

lmao. pwnt

[Fantasticone]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

Lets make a skill token where you have to 1800 combo+ Pants, we all know Tass has no hope to do that but he gets them anyway but whatever.

[nintendorules]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

and y is dat agin

ps at least spell my name right kkthx

You complain about spelling. Lets see.
PS capitalize it.
and should have been capitalized and well it is at the front of the sentence.
y is why
dat is that
agin is again
no punctuation
kkthx doesnt exist
You do not have a name that is worth spelling correctly.

[DarkbearX]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

Ironically, this token will be harder to get for the 'skilled' players than the unskilled players.

[Industreal]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

You completely ignored his question.

[Fantasticone]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

Seriously, I should like make the requirements, they would be fair and I would not discriminate against the non skilled players.

[Jtehanonymous]

Re: Starman requirement thread.

You complain about spelling. Lets see.
PS capitalize it.
and should have been capitalized and well it is at the front of the sentence.
y is why
dat is that
agin is again
no punctuation
kkthx doesnt exist
You do not have a name that is worth spelling correctly.

Try to keep the main theme rolling about the starman requirement. 0.0'

What's hard about it....Why don't you think/don't think it's a good idea for a skill token...that kind of stuff. =)

@Darkbear - I guess that makes it a little more fair for everyone, but at the same time, not fair. XD