Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[L.B.D.D]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Notes are due Sunday, December 15, 2013 at 11:59 pm CST/server time. I have around 10 files left.

so we should expect em by jan 10 right

[hi19hi19]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

sure its harsh but its the truth. ive been in this game a long time bro. ive been around the block and back. there are few left who know these streets like i do.

With your name and your avatar man, this is deep.

Carlos truly a veteran of the Stepmania ghetto, you are wise to ask him how things work in these parts.

[choof]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

am i deep

[omega_grunt666]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

am i deep

Yes

[hi19hi19]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

am i deep

the deepest

[DossarLX ODI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Finished judging.

1/10: 0
2/10: 3
3/10: 10
4/10: 4
5/10: 6
6/10: 12
7/10: 12
8/10: 10
9/10: 1
[PASS]: 2

327/58 = 5.64

[YoshL]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

shit this is a thing

[Charu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

10 3/10's? Phew, that's a lot.

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Typical

[rCaliberGX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

dossareviews

southern cross prolly got 3/10 lol

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Sometimes I wonder if judges are just psyching themselves into believing they're not being harsh enough, as opposed to a greater number of files being worse. So far, a good majority of the files I've looked through already have been really cool, and I'm not afraid to say it. There's nothing wrong with "appearing lenient" - it's all about being honest with the scores.

Then again, the low scores might be an effect of one being jaded by seeing so many similar files. As people do new things, it's harder to find more originality.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Bump again as a reminder to check that you're submitting files correctly. Someone has just submitted a file that includes nothing but a .dwi file. Not even a folder.

[choof]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

The section I'm judging has some really good song choice, I'm actually looking forward to playing the majority of the files.

Except renard. Fuck him.

[XelNya]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Sometimes I wonder if judges are just psyching themselves into believing they're not being harsh enough, as opposed to a greater number of files being worse. So far, a good majority of the files I've looked through already have been really cool, and I'm not afraid to say it. There's nothing wrong with "appearing lenient" - it's all about being honest with the scores.

Then again, the low scores might be an effect of one being jaded by seeing so many similar files. As people do new things, it's harder to find more originality.

Not sure how relevant this is to most of you, but when judging on TS I always thought I was being too mean point wise. Most charts I thought where acceptable got like 6.7 averages (due to the way TS judging worked due to averaging three things together) (This also means they just barely got accepted from me that is) and that was hard to do, because in my head it's like "this file is acceptable, but I don't feel anything about it is that great or memorable so it's just average" but then I'd see other judges give it like a 7 - 9 or something. Always felt weird to me. Then the one time I actually handed out an amazing score it got downed a bit by the others. lol

[Fission]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2