Genes

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aleco
    FFR Player
    • Oct 2003
    • 1054

    #16
    Evolution is wrong anyway. "We evolved from primates?" That is total stupidity.
    I still exist...

    Comment

    • makaveli121212
      FFR Player
      • May 2003
      • 3823

      #17
      we are primates you retard
      Originally posted by VxDx
      Stick it in her butt and pee.

      Comment

      • VxDx
        FFR Player
        • May 2003
        • 1871

        #18
        my jeans have a big stain in them.

        Comment

        • aleco
          FFR Player
          • Oct 2003
          • 1054

          #19
          Originally posted by makaveli121212
          we are primates you retard
          Did you realize developing science is constantly proving evolution to be wrong?

          Who's the retard now?

          I mean Evolution, not evolution.
          We do develop and adapt, but not like Evolution says.
          I still exist...

          Comment

          • DracIV
            FFR Player
            • Nov 2003
            • 298

            #20
            Aleco, you have shown no proof, so you shouldn't be talking. You didn't even say any specifics. Science is proving evolution right but wrong? What? You said evolution is wrong but Evolution is right? Show me the difference.

            We have the history of humans traced all the way back multiple species to the point when we left the forest. How can you tell me that we did not evolve from primates when we ARE primates?

            Comment

            • makaveli121212
              FFR Player
              • May 2003
              • 3823

              #21
              Originally posted by aleco
              Originally posted by makaveli121212
              we are primates you retard
              Did you realize developing science is constantly proving evolution to be wrong?

              Who's the retard now?

              I mean Evolution, not evolution.
              We do develop and adapt, but not like Evolution says.
              you have no fucking clue...evolution has nothing to do with us being primates...the group is comprised of simliar structured species...you go ahead and prove where science proves we're not part of an arbitrary group we made up to help classify species
              Originally posted by VxDx
              Stick it in her butt and pee.

              Comment

              • VxDx
                FFR Player
                • May 2003
                • 1871

                #22
                Originally posted by aleco
                Did you realize developing science is constantly proving evolution to be wrong?
                I'd really really really like to see your support for this. I mean, I understand if you don't believe in evolution as the basis of creation, but what you said is just ignorant.

                Comment

                • jewpinthethird
                  (The Fat's Sabobah)
                  FFR Music Producer
                  • Nov 2002
                  • 11711

                  #23
                  where did A, B and AB come from? mutations? i dont know, but it certainly isn't evolutionary.
                  Evolution is mutation. More specifically the mutation of a trait that aids in the survival of an animal so that it may be able to reproduce.

                  The only reason why Evolution is considered a theory is because there are no tests that can actually prove Evolution within a human's lifespan. THAT IS THE ONLY REASON.

                  Also, you must take in acoun that there are millions of human traits out there. And everytime someone is born, they are the product of two seperate individuals traits thrown into a melting pot and the result is a human being with 1,000,000,000,000 different combinations of traits.

                  Comment

                  • Lupin_the_3rd
                    FFR Player
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 2665

                    #24
                    no tests that can actually prove Evolution within a human's lifespan
                    aren't they using lab mice for tests because they reproduce every x(small number) days? They get many many generations in only a year.

                    Comment

                    • jewpinthethird
                      (The Fat's Sabobah)
                      FFR Music Producer
                      • Nov 2002
                      • 11711

                      #25
                      They are trying I guess. But to see a significant change it takes millions of years.

                      Comment

                      • FFR Player
                        • May 2002
                        • 1088

                        #26
                        Originally posted by 87x
                        refer to punnet squares.. someone with Bb crossed with someone with Bb for brown eyes over blue
                        B= brown eyes
                        b= blue eyes..

                        when solved its a 25% chance of BB; 50% chance of Bbl; and 25% chance of bb;

                        meaning that there is still hope for use blue eyed peoples...

                        and also, it has to do with genetic mutations, and things of the sort... eventually, like WAY down the road, there will only be one race of person.. no more whites, blacks, asains, indians, we will all become one race eventually... but never will we all look the same.. there are just too many elements that go into to physical features of people to get us all to look like identicals
                        BB = brown Bb = brown bb = blue

                        a parent of bb with blue eyes with a parent of brown eyes, BB and ALL of their children will have BROWN eyes.

                        parent Bb with Bb = 3/4th of their kids have brown

                        BB with Bb = all brown

                        bb with bb(Very rare, would have to have been pure blue-eyed parents since almost as long ago as cavemen)

                        and you can do this with any traits, hair color, everything down to the rate at which your fingernails grow.

                        this is what i mean. Less and less variation as people "mate' more.

                        the gene for blue eyes in humans will be worth a lot of money in the future, as will many other recessive traits that will die with time.

                        Comment

                        • Jam930
                          FFR Player
                          • Apr 2004
                          • 1069

                          #27
                          Originally posted by 87x
                          refer to punnet squares.. someone with Bb crossed with someone with Bb for brown eyes over blue
                          B= brown eyes
                          b= blue eyes..

                          when solved its a 25% chance of BB; 50% chance of Bbl; and 25% chance of bb;

                          meaning that there is still hope for use blue eyed peoples...

                          and also, it has to do with genetic mutations, and things of the sort... eventually, like WAY down the road, there will only be one race of person.. no more whites, blacks, asains, indians, we will all become one race eventually... but never will we all look the same.. there are just too many elements that go into to physical features of people to get us all to look like identicals
                          BB = brown Bb = brown bb = blue

                          a parent of bb with blue eyes with a parent of brown eyes, BB and ALL of their children will have BROWN eyes.

                          parent Bb with Bb = 3/4th of their kids have brown

                          BB with Bb = all brown

                          bb with bb(Very rare, would have to have been pure blue-eyed parents since almost as long ago as cavemen)

                          and you can do this with any traits, hair color, everything down to the rate at which your fingernails grow.

                          this is what i mean. Less and less variation as people "mate' more.

                          the gene for blue eyes in humans will be worth a lot of money in the future, as will many other recessive traits that will die with time.


                          edit*
                          god, i have to type at 90000wpm to get my message through before it logs me out. that should be changed =/
                          -Jamie

                          Comment

                          • makaveli121212
                            FFR Player
                            • May 2003
                            • 3823

                            #28
                            Originally posted by makaveli121212
                            Hardy-Weinberg, thats all you need to know about recessive genes in a population...do a google search for it...common knowledge
                            Originally posted by VxDx
                            Stick it in her butt and pee.

                            Comment

                            • Jam930
                              FFR Player
                              • Apr 2004
                              • 1069

                              #29
                              i want to talk. hear your people's ideas, and maybe change the way i think. i dont want to do a search directing me to go to some page that's gonna tell me what to think.

                              u could pull a google on basically any thread in "critical thinking" and get a good answer.
                              -Jamie

                              Comment

                              • makaveli121212
                                FFR Player
                                • May 2003
                                • 3823

                                #30
                                you cant talk about something like that...your question is flawed...recessive genes do not disappear in the general population unless it becomes a severe dissadvantage for the species, but that also would occur with dominant genes...your idea and question, though logical, is completely off-base...this is not an opinion question, the truth and fact were found out by those to guys...they wont rell you what to think, but they do tell you how it is and why it is...so if you wish to continue to be misinformed and if you wish to continue your ignorance by not taking 5 minutes to look up why youre wrong, then thats your business, but dont try to make an arguement out of something that isnt debateable
                                Originally posted by VxDx
                                Stick it in her butt and pee.

                                Comment

                                Working...