Genes

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jam930
    FFR Player
    • Apr 2004
    • 1069

    #1

    Genes

    There are dominant genes and recessive genes. Genes of parents...come together....dominant genes rules...these dominant genes...hm. This means that eventually all girls will look the same. and all boys will look the same. we know this. all the people from scandinavia look more alike that people from scandinavia vs papua new guinea.

    Doesn't this contradict the theory of evolution?
    -Jamie
  • perfect_fat
    FFR Player
    • Mar 2004
    • 161

    #2
    In some aspects, yes it does. You see it with similar facial features among people. Jewish people having large noses, Mediterranean Europeans have darker skin than northern europeans etc.

    But this brings up the question of where those genetic traits were developed. Most scientitsts say they've adapted to their habitats over thousands of generations of evolution. Today, we control our environment for the most part and we, in theory, will develop different traits.

    However, recessive genes often pop up. For example, a white woman in the states had twins. One of them had black skin (they did the DNA tests and everything and he was the son of a white woman and white man). This supports the theory that the first homosapien (Known as Eve) was somewhere in africa. She met up with another homosapien and they mutliplied and spread out across the world.

    Comment

    • Jello
      FFR Simfile Author
      FFR Simfile Author
      • Jan 2007
      • 612

      #3
      meh.... thats not true. ill just say this. durring meosis the chromosomes unravel and crap.

      after that when they split and copy themselves. durring this process randomly,

      little sections are crossed creating new genes. thats why you can have a sis but not look the same.

      Comment

      • RobbyZero
        FFR Player
        • Sep 2003
        • 4613

        #4
        l

        ittle sections are crossed creating new genes. thats why you can have a sis but not look the same
        What about when the little sections dont cross creating new genes,they stay the same therefore twins?

        Comment

        • Jello
          FFR Simfile Author
          FFR Simfile Author
          • Jan 2007
          • 612

          #5
          yep thats right. through the history of life on this planet, that has happened. the chromosomes decided to stop crossing.chromosomes dont just decide not to do something that happens naturally, and is uncontrolled.

          think back to the thread about "is another me possible"... same princible.

          as for the twins comment. twins are caused when the initial stages of the zygote split and then develope serperatly. your body wont decide one day " oh lets produce all the sperm exactly the same!" because it just doesnt happen when your body just wants to pump those suckers out. doesnt take the time to make sure the DNA is the same like in mitosis

          Comment

          • RobbyZero
            FFR Player
            • Sep 2003
            • 4613

            #6
            Twins Triplets and so on is basically random

            Comment

            • Jello
              FFR Simfile Author
              FFR Simfile Author
              • Jan 2007
              • 612

              #7
              its random if the zygote splits. the only difference between twins and quads is how many times the zygote splits before it starts to develope.

              Comment

              • makaveli121212
                FFR Player
                • May 2003
                • 3823

                #8
                Re: Genes

                Originally posted by Jam930
                There are dominant genes and recessive genes. Genes of parents...come together....dominant genes rules...these dominant genes...hm. This means that eventually all girls will look the same. and all boys will look the same. we know this. all the people from scandinavia look more alike that people from scandinavia vs papua new guinea.

                Doesn't this contradict the theory of evolution?

                wrong, wrong, wrong
                we know this
                Originally posted by VxDx
                Stick it in her butt and pee.

                Comment

                • Jam930
                  FFR Player
                  • Apr 2004
                  • 1069

                  #9
                  Re: Genes

                  Originally posted by makaveli121212
                  Originally posted by Jam930
                  There are dominant genes and recessive genes. Genes of parents...come together....dominant genes rules...these dominant genes...hm. This means that eventually all girls will look the same. and all boys will look the same. we know this. all the people from scandinavia look more alike that people from scandinavia vs papua new guinea.

                  Doesn't this contradict the theory of evolution?

                  wrong, wrong, wrong
                  we know this
                  hm? we know that people living together for a long time, cross-breeding, will start to look more and more the same. Unless some foriegn genes enters the picture, people will continue to look more and more alike, as the dominant genes take over. blue eyes or brown eyes? brown eyes = dominant, so eventually everyone in a certain area will start to pickup brown eyes over blue. this idea explains why...

                  the people from scandinavia look more alike that people from scandinavia vs papua new guinea.
                  so im saying eventually the world population, after a million years of mating, would all pickup the dominant gene and we'd all look pretty similar.

                  and this kinda goes against evolution.
                  -Jamie

                  Comment

                  • Jam930
                    FFR Player
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 1069

                    #10
                    Originally posted by perfect_fat
                    (Known as Eve) was somewhere in africa. She met up with another homosapien and they mutliplied and spread out across the world.
                    now that...well. you'd have like 2 humans to start with i suppose...meaning one VERY small genepool. see how could u get recessive genes from ancesters that also had the dominant? recessive genes are lost through time. and type O blood is also recessive, but among westerners its most common...where did A, B and AB come from? mutations? i dont know, but it certainly isn't evolutionary.
                    -Jamie

                    Comment

                    • Lupin_the_3rd
                      FFR Player
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 2665

                      #11
                      where did A, B and AB come from? mutations? i dont know, but it certainly isn't evolutionary.
                      why not?

                      Comment

                      • makaveli121212
                        FFR Player
                        • May 2003
                        • 3823

                        #12
                        Hardy-Weinberg, thats all you need to know about recessive genes in a population...do a google search for it...common knowledge
                        Originally posted by VxDx
                        Stick it in her butt and pee.

                        Comment

                        • DracIV
                          FFR Player
                          • Nov 2003
                          • 298

                          #13
                          Simple answer: The dominant genes aren't the ones always passed on. It all depends on how unlucky you get whether or not we all look alike, and even then there will be different people who got the recessives.

                          Comment

                          • makaveli121212
                            FFR Player
                            • May 2003
                            • 3823

                            #14
                            trust me the guys i posted above proved how the recessive genes stay in the population...your question is flawed jam...humans didnt start out with just one blood type by the way...considering we evolved from other primates, they also had different blood types...most of the first humans and very very similar DNA to the apes, etc. Most of human DNA is the same if not close to the same as apes, etc. Blood type is definately evolutionary
                            Originally posted by VxDx
                            Stick it in her butt and pee.

                            Comment

                            • 87x
                              Retired Staff
                              • Dec 2002
                              • 4379

                              #15
                              refer to punnet squares.. someone with Bb crossed with someone with Bb for brown eyes over blue
                              B= brown eyes
                              b= blue eyes..

                              when solved its a 25% chance of BB; 50% chance of Bbl; and 25% chance of bb;

                              meaning that there is still hope for use blue eyed peoples...

                              and also, it has to do with genetic mutations, and things of the sort... eventually, like WAY down the road, there will only be one race of person.. no more whites, blacks, asains, indians, we will all become one race eventually... but never will we all look the same.. there are just too many elements that go into to physical features of people to get us all to look like identicals


                              RAVEnHEXa: Lip ring is because I want to be a professional piercer.
                              87x: more like.. professional goth.

                              Comment

                              Working...