Good god, I really am an idiot...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Neo26988
    FFR Player
    • Jan 2004
    • 35

    #1

    Good god, I really am an idiot...

    After all the talk of Overall Rank being based soley on how much you play, I completely misunderstood what was being said. I always thought they meant that since some people play a lot more than others, they have the time to become a lot better, more time to perfect their scores and therefore would have a better rank. Never did it occur to me that every single score you get (whether personal best or not) counts to your overall score. I'm such a n00b, hah

    I may start a new account now that I knew this, 'cause I use to (as in, first 2500/3000 games or something) 'suicide' immediately if I screwed up on a level. Dammit

    Now, my question is, why were the rankings made like this? I've always assumed the ranks were simply a total of all your best scores from each level, but hah, was I wrong.
  • thedancingqueen
    FFR Player
    • Jul 2004
    • 9

    #2
    right...

    Comment

    • jimerax
      FFR Simfile Author
      FFR Music Producer
      • Nov 2003
      • 8185

      #3
      Re: Good god, I really am an idiot...

      Originally posted by Neo26988
      Now, my question is, why were the rankings made like this? I've always assumed the ranks were simply a total of all your best scores from each level, but hah, was I wrong.
      That way will be a huge burden for the FFR server, so not easy to do.

      Comment

      • ddrking133
        FFR Player
        • Jun 2004
        • 584

        #4
        Re: Good god, I really am an idiot...

        Originally posted by jimerax
        Originally posted by Neo26988
        Now, my question is, why were the rankings made like this? I've always assumed the ranks were simply a total of all your best scores from each level, but hah, was I wrong.
        That way will be a huge burden for the FFR server, so not easy to do.
        Originally posted by jimerax
        Originally posted by Neo26988
        Now, my question is, why were the rankings made like this? I've always assumed the ranks were simply a total of all your best scores from each level, but hah, was I wrong.
        That way will be a huge burden for the FFR server, so not easy to do.

        Originally posted by jimerax
        Originally posted by Neo26988
        Now, my question is, why were the rankings made like this? I've always assumed the ranks were simply a total of all your best scores from each level, but hah, was I wrong.
        That way will be a huge burden for the FFR server, so not easy to do.

        Originally posted by jimerax
        Originally posted by Neo26988
        Now, my question is, why were the rankings made like this? I've always assumed the ranks were simply a total of all your best scores from each level, but hah, was I wrong.
        That way will be a huge burden for the FFR server, so not easy to do.
        Originally posted by jimerax
        Originally posted by Neo26988
        Now, my question is, why were the rankings made like this? I've always assumed the ranks were simply a total of all your best scores from each level, but hah, was I wrong.
        That way will be a huge burden for the FFR server, so not easy to do.
        Originally posted by jimerax
        Originally posted by Neo26988
        Now, my question is, why were the rankings made like this? I've always assumed the ranks were simply a total of all your best scores from each level, but hah, was I wrong.
        That way will be a huge burden for the FFR server, so not easy to do.
        [/center]

        Comment

        Working...