Consider this quote -
“We talk glibly on the creative musician, but, however clever he may be, he cannot, magician like, produce music out of nothing; and if he were to make the attempt he would only put himself back into the position of the primitive stage. All that he can do and, as a matter of fact, does, is to make use of the material bequeathed to him by his predecessors, fashion it anew and in such a manner that he can through it, and by means of it, express himself.” – Cecil Sharp
In our creative endeavors, whether in music or otherwise, can something be created that is truly original? How important is the ground-work of our predecessors; are the histories of music, art, or literature an evolutionary chain as suggested by this quote?
“We talk glibly on the creative musician, but, however clever he may be, he cannot, magician like, produce music out of nothing; and if he were to make the attempt he would only put himself back into the position of the primitive stage. All that he can do and, as a matter of fact, does, is to make use of the material bequeathed to him by his predecessors, fashion it anew and in such a manner that he can through it, and by means of it, express himself.” – Cecil Sharp
In our creative endeavors, whether in music or otherwise, can something be created that is truly original? How important is the ground-work of our predecessors; are the histories of music, art, or literature an evolutionary chain as suggested by this quote?





Comment