The Death Penalty

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • perfect_fat
    FFR Player
    • Mar 2004
    • 161

    #1

    The Death Penalty

    China, Iran, the United States and Vietnam were the world's top users of the death penalty in 2003, accounting for 84 percent of known executions, human rights body Amnesty International said Tuesday.

    More than half of known executions were in China, where the true toll could be more than 10 times higher, according to the British-based Amnesty's annual report.



    It's kind of a manipulative headline, china is responsible for the vast majority of that 84%, us has around 65 executions and china over 600.

    Anyways, what do you guys think of the death penalty? I'm against killing in general, but if you've got a totally deranged psycho who's out of touch with reality, isn't it better to put them out of their misery sometimes, instead of paying for their meals until they finally die?

    On the other hand, as many as 10% of all deathrow inmates are innocent, I heard that on A&E.

    What's your take on it?
  • Chrissi
    FFR Player
    • Mar 2004
    • 3019

    #2
    They not always 100% sure the people are guilty. I remember a long time ago when they found out that a guy who had been put to death ALREADY was completely innocent.. they gave the family a few billion dollars or something to "make up for it".

    This is the main reason why I'm against the death penalty (and we don't have it here in Canada, yay). They're often not as sure as they think they are.
    C is for Charisma, it's why people think I'm great! I make my friends all laugh and smile and never want to hate!

    Comment

    • lightdarkness
      Summer!!
      • Jul 2003
      • 11308

      #3
      I belive if there is enough evidence that i can be proven many different ways that they did the crime, then they should be put to death.

      Comment

      • usamablackbelt
        FFR Player
        • Apr 2004
        • 20

        #4
        Why?
        Money?
        Because it will save us money?
        It takes the perpetrator off the streets.

        Then why execution?
        There is a simple pill of a compound unknown to me.
        Simple, nearly instant. Painless.

        Electrocution.
        Lethal Injection.

        My understanding of Capital punishment is not a painless death.
        Can the state not have humanity in its killing?

        People want revenge.
        Suffering.
        We're not sure of afterlife. Even those who see hellfire in the executee's future. So there is the desire for his eye. From the taking of ours.

        The state is made of the people.


        Capital Punishment.

        Toward our willingness to exact this punishment,
        And our individual willingness to accept it,

        Specforces

        Comment

        • Specforces
          Yes
          • Jan 2004
          • 5028

          #5
          ^For some reason FFR is glitching and signed me in as that person above me, I've never seen that screenname before, weird, huh?

          Specforces
          Check Out My Music

          Comment

          • boccobrock
            FFR Player
            • Nov 2003
            • 37

            #6
            I believe that the death penalty is not correct or right and that the people that are put to death should be given a second chance. The thing is, is that it is not possible to just not put them to death. Often the family members of the person that was killed, as that should be the only reason to put someone to death, wan't the murderer to get the death penalty. The thing is even though nobody really wants the person to die, we don't have any alternative. Putting them in jail for life isn't giving them a second chance, its just putting them in a concrete room, and wasting the goverments money. The best thing to do would be to try and find a talent they have, get them to contribute to society. But this can't be done without endangering other people if the murderer still is set on killing. So They can't give them a second chance and nothing can be done. That is why the death penalty is wrong and I do not like it, but I do realize that it is neccesary until we can find a way to let them become a better person without endangering others. So that is my statement on that.

            On the subject of china killing so much, I simply think that they need to realize that by not being very friendly with other countries and by not having a vrey good goverment, they are effectively killing themselves. I think all of the asian countries need to try and make themselves better goverments.

            Thanks for reading,
            Boccobrock

            Comment

            • perfect_fat
              FFR Player
              • Mar 2004
              • 161

              #7
              You also have to remember that china is a dictatorship and their population is 10 times the size of the united states, so they're close to equal per capita.

              You can get the death penalty if you get caught with weed in Indonesia (i'm pretty sure it's indonesia). That's crazy.

              But if somebody won't be rehabilitated, and I think we will all agree that drugging them up to the point where they're barely in touch with reality is cruel, and they are set on murdering more, they attack guards and other inmates, should they be put to sleep like a rapid dog?

              Comment

              • Specforces
                Yes
                • Jan 2004
                • 5028

                #8
                Firing squads, simple way to kill a killer. Cost-effective too.

                Specforces
                Check Out My Music

                Comment

                • User6773

                  #9
                  An unjust punishment.

                  MYTH: The death penalty is a fair punishment, because "the punishment suits the crime."
                  FACT: We do not use that same philosophy with our other punishments. We do not mug muggers. We do not rape rapists. We do not abuse abusers. There is no reason for us to kill killers.

                  MYTH: The death penalty is cheaper than life-in-prison
                  FACT: Because states require more prosecutors and longer cases and allow more appeals on death penalty cases, the average death penalty sentence costs the taxpayers tens of thousands more than the average life-without-parole sentence. In addition, while all the court proceedings are occuring, the defendant is spending years in prison spending the same amount of taxpayer money he would anyway.

                  MYTH: Lethal injection is painless.
                  FACT: There are many cases in which lethal injection has gone horribly wrong. Either not enough drug has been given to kill the person (sending them into excruciating pain) or a usable vein cannot be found (on heroin addicts.)

                  Comment

                  • perfect_fat
                    FFR Player
                    • Mar 2004
                    • 161

                    #10
                    chardish, got any sources to back up the cost comparison?

                    Comment

                    • User6773

                      #11
                      Originally posted by perfect_fat
                      chardish, got any sources to back up the cost comparison?
                      Originally posted by From: The Case Against The Death Penalty
                      The latest mode of inflicting the death penalty, enacted into law by
                      nearly two dozen states, is lethal injection, first used in Texas in 1982.
                      It is easy to overstate the humaneness and efficacy of this method. There
                      is no way of knowing that it is really painless. As the U.S. Court of
                      Appeals observed, there is "substantial and uncontroverted evidence ...
                      that execution by lethal injection poses a serious risk of cruel,
                      protracted death.... Even a slight error in dosage or administration can
                      leave a prisoner conscious but paralyzed while dying, a sentient witness
                      of his or her own asphyxiation." (Chaney v. Heckler, 718 F.2d 1174 [1983])

                      Nor does the execution always proceed smoothly as planned. In 1985 "the
                      authorities repeatedly jabbed needles into ... Stephen Morin, when they
                      had trouble finding a usable vein because he had been a drug abuser."(40)
                      In 1988, during the execution of Raymond Landry, "a tube attached to a
                      needle inside the inmate's right arm began leaking, sending the lethal
                      mixture shooting across the death chamber toward witnesses."(41)

                      Indeed, by its veneer of decency and by subtle analogy with life-saving
                      medical practice, death by lethal injection makes killing as punishment
                      more acceptable to the public. Even when it prevents the struggles of the
                      condemned person and avoids maiming the body, it is no different from
                      hanging or shooting as an expression of the absolute power of the state
                      over the helpless individual.

                      Comment

                      • perfect_fat
                        FFR Player
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 161

                        #12
                        I didn't see anything about the cost there?

                        But I think it's logical to assume that after somebody dies, you can't ask them if their lethal injection hurt.

                        Comment

                        • User6773

                          #13
                          By the same logic, you can say "After somebody dies, you can't ask them if their brutal multiple stabbings hurt."

                          Comment

                          • perfect_fat
                            FFR Player
                            • Mar 2004
                            • 161

                            #14
                            Yeah, maybe it felt good. An orgy of pain so overwhelming it actually felt good.

                            Comment

                            • User6773

                              #15
                              See the movie "The Passion Of The Christ" and then tell me that would feel good.

                              Comment

                              Working...