if you were to write a 3 minute speech on you views on abortion how would it go? i will post mine too. (remeber the other side always has a valide point be sure to include their views too).
You learn in debate classes and in English argumentation essays that you never include the other side of the argument. That's just stupid. Let those that feel that way argue that point, but if you want to make a statement, you have to force your own side and not even really care that there is another side.
My own views on the subject are simple. If the sex that lead to the creation of said baby was consensual (as in, not forced, IE: Rape [and I might add that rape 99.9% of the time does not lead to pregnancy]), then that mother sure as hell better have that kid. Accept responsibilities for your actions. That is my bottom line. If you do not wish to have a child, then you shouldn't be allowed to participate in the action that leads to it.
SIG PICTURES:
POINTLESSLY TAKING UP BANDWIDTH SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE INTERNET
Murder is wrong, that's true. However, abortion, is not murder (or so I believe), because you cannot kill (make dead) what has not even lived (or what I believe is living) yet.
I agree fully. Or I would have, until that damn Chardish made me rethink my whole stand on this subject. Only on the facts that it seems a fetus is living. I still disagree about the whole sex stand some people took on it, which is why I just don't know.
Now, I agree for the most part.
Originally posted by Henri Poincaré
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful to do so. He studies it because he takes pleasure in it, and he takes pleasure in it because it is beautiful.
i just read the 8 page discussion on abortion. Chardish seems to me to be a misinformed person. Sites that are not for abortion will make up things and call them facts, just so they will get more people to follow.
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful to do so. He studies it because he takes pleasure in it, and he takes pleasure in it because it is beautiful.
i just read the 8 page discussion on abortion. Chardish seems to me to be a misinformed person. Sites that are not for abortion will make up things and call them facts, just so they will get more people to follow.
So OBVIOSULY everything that the pro-"choice" side says is 100% truthful?
SIG PICTURES:
POINTLESSLY TAKING UP BANDWIDTH SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE INTERNET
yeah this albino guy is retarded...hes gonna come in here and post his biased crap and denounceing 'prestigous' members of the forums without even backing his own statements...how about i give you 10 anti-abortion sites and you find things made up on each one, and then prove they are made up
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful to do so. He studies it because he takes pleasure in it, and he takes pleasure in it because it is beautiful.
You learn in debate classes and in English argumentation essays that you never include the other side of the argument. That's just stupid. Let those that feel that way argue that point, but if you want to make a statement, you have to force your own side and not even really care that there is another side.
i would have to disagree with you there. i got outta a speech class last semester in college and one of the major points that was taught was to include points that would be used against your argument, and then prove them wrong. this way members of your audience who initially disagreed with you have nothing to fall back on while your giving your speech added credibility.
In terms of this whole topic, i believe in the current standard of abortion in some areas, where its legal until the end of the first trimester, is alright. you need to set the line somewhere, and i think that that time is as good as any.
Comment