Time Travel

[BluE_MeaniE]

The faster you go, the slower time goes.
So yes, theoretically, if you go fast enough, you could stop time, and then go back in time.
Also, the faster something goes, the less mass it has, or something like that, I'm really not positive, so if you go fast enough to go back in time, you'll become nothing.
But that's only in theory.
In theory, communism works. In theory.
But Einstein already said that. And then other people in this forum repeated it.
And then I repeated them.
I'm sorry, actually, for doing that.

[Brainmaster07]

In theory, communism works. In theory.

LOL. :P.

[silverbloodedbob]

i think someday going back in time is possible, but never forward.

[silverbloodedbob]

i think someday going back in time is possible, but never forward.

[Anticrombie0909]

^^^Double post

[BluE_MeaniE]

Well, going forward at a different speed than right now, may not be possible...although the speed changes depending on how fast you are moving....

Anyways in the sense that someone who repeated Hawking said, it may be more possible for going forward in time, because nobody has gone back in time from the future to our present, that we know of, so we can assume that it'll never exist, but then again, nobody would have gone into the future to our present from our past, because it hasn't been found out, but it hasn't really been proved impossible like I just said before in this really long run-on sentence.

[JustJono]

I can't believe no one has brought up the question:
Does 'time' even exist?

Anyone who's seen K-PAX will know that you can travel faster than the speed of light,

if you already are. *smiles*

[VxDx]

Time travel into the past is impossible, proved by the existance of many paradoxes. Time travel into the future is "possible" but only because of the way that we percieve "time".

[Yanah_God]

Time travel into the past is impossible, proved by the existance of many paradoxes. Time travel into the future is "possible" but only because of the way that we percieve "time".

time travel into the future, too, is impossible, unless you were to simply vanish from exsistance only to apear a set amount of time later

i don't know how to prove it, but it's the only thing that seems to make sense

[chillywilly]

this was on the man show-

how to time travel

1.say goodbye to family and friends
2.drink one bottle of tequila
3.wake up 1 day in the future

[Ridge]

i dont know how humans could infringe in the fabric of time.. i dont understand how anyone would be able to touch that.

[Varia]

I can't believe no one has brought up the question:
Does 'time' even exist?

Anyone who's seen K-PAX will know that you can travel faster than the speed of light,

if you already are. *smiles*

Yeah, we are already moving pretty fast. The Earth isn't just sitting there in space, in the same place, forever. We're being sucked into some other solar system or something due to it's huge gravitational pull at some ridiculous speed. So, this means that when you see light, it is either going light speed + however fast we are going or light speed - however fast we are going, depending on which direction we are going and the light is going. So this light you see is probably already going faster than light speed. You know, i'm not getting my point across about the whole light going faster than itself thing. If you think about it, you'll probably get it.

[Brainmaster07]

I can't believe no one has brought up the question:
Does 'time' even exist?

Anyone who's seen K-PAX will know that you can travel faster than the speed of light,

if you already are. *smiles*

Yeah, we are already moving pretty fast. The Earth isn't just sitting there in space, in the same place, forever. We're being sucked into some other solar system or something due to it's huge gravitational pull at some ridiculous speed. So, this means that when you see light, it is either going light speed + however fast we are going or light speed - however fast we are going, depending on which direction we are going and the light is going. So this light you see is probably already going faster than light speed. You know, i'm not getting my point across about the whole light going faster than itself thing. If you think about it, you'll probably get it.

But that's according to our frame of reference. If were heading straight toward light comming our way, the light would seem to be going faster, but it actually it isn't...

[BluE_MeaniE]

Varia's post

That's a good theory, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't work.
I think I remember something about this in physics class.
Relative speed is different then, like, actual speed, or something.
So it's really just going light speed, but it's also being pulled by gravity at the same speed.
Or something. I'm sorry, I don't know for sure, but I'm almost positive that's not true.

Edit: I was late.

[Varia]

Yeah, I was trying to get that out but couldn't. I wanted to explain something else, too, but it not come out of brain to text arrrr